Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Dec;47(4):289-97.
doi: 10.1007/s12088-007-0054-2. Epub 2008 Jan 11.

Induced systemic resistance (ISR) in plants: mechanism of action

Affiliations

Induced systemic resistance (ISR) in plants: mechanism of action

Devendra K Choudhary et al. Indian J Microbiol. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Plants possess a range of active defense apparatuses that can be actively expressed in response to biotic stresses (pathogens and parasites) of various scales (ranging from microscopic viruses to phytophagous insect). The timing of this defense response is critical and reflects on the difference between coping and succumbing to such biotic challenge of necrotizing pathogens/parasites. If defense mechanisms are triggered by a stimulus prior to infection by a plant pathogen, disease can be reduced. Induced resistance is a state of enhanced defensive capacity developed by a plant when appropriately stimulated. Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and induced systemic resistance (ISR) are two forms of induced resistance wherein plant defenses are preconditioned by prior infection or treatment that results in resistance against subsequent challenge by a pathogen or parasite. Selected strains of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) suppress diseases by antagonism between the bacteria and soil-borne pathogens as well as by inducing a systemic resistance in plant against both root and foliar pathogens. Rhizobacteria mediated ISR resembles that of pathogen induced SAR in that both types of induced resistance render uninfected plant parts more resistant towards a broad spectrum of plant pathogens. Several rhizobacteria trigger the salicylic acid (SA)-dependent SAR pathway by producing SA at the root surface whereas other rhizobacteria trigger different signaling pathway independent of SA. The existence of SA-independent ISR pathway has been studied in Arabidopsis thaliana, which is dependent on jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene signaling. Specific Pseudomonas strains induce systemic resistance in viz., carnation, cucumber, radish, tobacco, and Arabidopsis, as evidenced by an enhanced defensive capacity upon challenge inoculation. Combination of ISR and SAR can increase protection against pathogens that are resisted through both pathways besides extended protection to a broader spectrum of pathogens than ISR/SAR alone. Beside Pseudomonas strains, ISR is conducted by Bacillus spp. wherein published results show that several specific strains of species B. amyloliquifaciens, B. subtilis, B. pasteurii, B. cereus, B. pumilus, B. mycoides, and B.sphaericus elicit significant reduction in the incidence or severity of various diseases on a diversity of hosts.

Keywords: Induced systemic resistance; Jasmonate and ethylene signalling; Pathogenesis-related proteins; SAR; Signalling and expression.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Weller D.M., Raajmakers J.M., Gardener B.B.M., Thomashow L.S. Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressivness plant pathogens. Annl Rev Phytopathol. 2002;40:309–348. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.40.030402.110010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haas D., Keel C., Reimann C. Signal transduction in plant beneficial rhizobacteria with biocontrol properties. Antonie van Leeuw. 2002;81:385–395. doi: 10.1023/A:1020549019981. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loon L.C., Glick B.R. Increased plant fitness by rhizobacteria. In: Sandermann H., editor. Molecular ecotoxicology of plants. Berlin: Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2004. pp. 177–205.
    1. Haas D., Défago G. Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nature Rev Microbiol. 2005;4:1–13. - PubMed
    1. Pieterse C.M.J., Ton J., Loon L.C. Cross-talk between plant defence signaling pathways: boost or burden? Agri Biotech Net. 2001;3:1–18.

LinkOut - more resources