Aseptic glenoid loosening or failure in total shoulder arthroplasty: revision with glenoid reimplantation

Abstract

Hypothesis and background: Reimplantation of a new glenoid component for symptomatic glenoid failure after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a well-established surgical strategy. In case of aseptic glenoid loosening or failure, revision of TSA by reimplantation of a cemented glenoid implant would be a reliable therapeutic option.

Materials and methods: This retrospective multicenter study included 42 TSAs with symptomatic failed glenoids revised by reimplantation of an all-polyethylene (PE), cemented glenoid component. All patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically, with a mean follow-up of 74 months.

Results: The failed initial glenoid component was metal backed in 32 cases and PE cemented in 10. The main cause of glenoid failure was component loosening in 19 cases (46%) and PE wear or dissociation in 23 (54%). Associated complications were very frequent, including rotator cuff tears, subscapularis insufficiency, and prosthesis instability. At last follow-up, 7 patients (17%) had already been re-revised because of symptomatic recurrent glenoid loosening. The overall rate of recurrent glenoid loosening (re-revision plus radiologic loosening) was 67%. Soft-tissue problems and prosthetic instability were significantly associated with recurrent loosening. Of the 10 associated bone grafts performed during the revision procedure, all were partially or totally lysed. At follow-up, the mean Constant score was 57 points (gain of 16 points) and the mean active anterior elevation was 125° (gain of 19°).

Conclusion: This study suggests that revision of a TSA with reimplantation of an all-PE cemented glenoid component does not solve the problem of glenoid loosening. Soft-tissue failure and prosthetic instability are underestimated preoperatively and may explain, in part, the high rate of recurrent glenoid loosening.