Stakeholder perspectives on handovers between hospital staff and general practitioners: an evaluation through the microsystems lens
- PMID: 23118408
- PMCID: PMC3551202
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001192
Stakeholder perspectives on handovers between hospital staff and general practitioners: an evaluation through the microsystems lens
Abstract
Background: Much of the research on improving patient handovers has focused on enhancing communication within the hospital system, but there have been relatively few efforts aimed at addressing the challenges at the interface between the hospital and the primary care setting.
Methods: A qualitative thematic analysis using a clinical microsystems lens applied to 28 semi-structured key stakeholder interviews in the Netherlands. Data were organised into seven 'virtual' clinical microsystem datasets composed of patients, hospital-based physicians, hospital-based nurses and community-based general practitioners.
Results: Five themes that contributed to effective or ineffective handovers emerged from our analysis: (1) lack of adequate information; (2) healthcare professionals' availability and opportunity for personal contact; (3) feedback, teaching and protocols related to handovers; (4) information technology facilitated communication solutions; and (5) the role and responsibility of patients. Our analysis suggests that each healthcare professional attempted to provide the best care possible, but did this largely in isolation, and without the benefit of the knowledge and expertise of the other members of the microsystem.
Conclusions: The microsystem approach offers an innovative organisational construct and approach to assess the gaps in 'hospital to community' patient handovers, by viewing the hospital to the community interface as a clinical microsystem continuum. Our application of the microsystem approach confirms and extends earlier findings about the impact of barriers on the continuity and safety of patient transitions and their impact on the quality of patient care.
Figures
Comment in
-
The European HANDOVER project: the role of nursing.BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec;21 Suppl 1:i6-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001253. Epub 2012 Oct 16. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012. PMID: 23077278 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Searching for the missing pieces between the hospital and primary care: mapping the patient process during care transitions.BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec;21 Suppl 1:i97-105. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001215. Epub 2012 Nov 1. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012. PMID: 23118409
-
The European HANDOVER project: the role of nursing.BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec;21 Suppl 1:i6-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001253. Epub 2012 Oct 16. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012. PMID: 23077278 No abstract available.
-
Beliefs and experiences can influence patient participation in handover between primary and secondary care--a qualitative study of patient perspectives.BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec;21 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i76-83. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001179. Epub 2012 Oct 30. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012. PMID: 23112289 Free PMC article.
-
Building continuity in handovers with shorter residency duty hours.BMC Med Educ. 2014;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-S1-S16. Epub 2014 Dec 11. BMC Med Educ. 2014. PMID: 25560954 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical handovers between prehospital and hospital staff: literature review.Emerg Med J. 2015 Jul;32(7):577-81. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203165. Epub 2014 Sep 1. Emerg Med J. 2015. PMID: 25178977 Review.
Cited by
-
Nurses' perceptions of the ISBAR handover protocol and its relationship to the quality of handover: A case study of bilingual nurses.Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 23;14:1021110. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1021110. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36910802 Free PMC article.
-
Designing the learning of intraprofessional collaboration among medical residents.Med Educ. 2022 Oct;56(10):1017-1031. doi: 10.1111/medu.14868. Epub 2022 Jul 24. Med Educ. 2022. PMID: 35791303 Free PMC article.
-
Hospital physicians' experiences and reflections on their work and role in relation to older patients' pathways - a qualitative study in two Norwegian hospitals.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 5;22(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07846-1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35382820 Free PMC article.
-
Talking together in rural palliative care: a qualitative study of interprofessional collaboration in Norway.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 7;22(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07713-z. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35255918 Free PMC article.
-
An evaluation of the clinical microsystems approach in general practice quality improvement.Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2020 Jun 23;21:e21. doi: 10.1017/S1463423620000158. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2020. PMID: 32638688 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wagner C, de Bruijne M. Onbedoelde schade in Nederlandse Ziekenhuizen. EMGO Instituut en NIVEL, 2007
-
- Zegers M, de Bruijne MC, Wagner C, et al. Adverse events and potentially preventable deaths in Dutch hospitals: results of a retrospective patient record review study. Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:297–302 - PubMed
-
- Wachter RM. The end of the beginning: patient safety five years after ‘to err is human’. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004;(Suppl Web Exclusives):W4-534.– - PubMed
-
- Wachter RM. Patient safety at ten: unmistakable progress, troubling gaps. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:165–73 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources