Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2012 Dec;21 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i106-13.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001192. Epub 2012 Nov 1.

Stakeholder perspectives on handovers between hospital staff and general practitioners: an evaluation through the microsystems lens

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Multicenter Study

Stakeholder perspectives on handovers between hospital staff and general practitioners: an evaluation through the microsystems lens

Beryl Göbel et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Much of the research on improving patient handovers has focused on enhancing communication within the hospital system, but there have been relatively few efforts aimed at addressing the challenges at the interface between the hospital and the primary care setting.

Methods: A qualitative thematic analysis using a clinical microsystems lens applied to 28 semi-structured key stakeholder interviews in the Netherlands. Data were organised into seven 'virtual' clinical microsystem datasets composed of patients, hospital-based physicians, hospital-based nurses and community-based general practitioners.

Results: Five themes that contributed to effective or ineffective handovers emerged from our analysis: (1) lack of adequate information; (2) healthcare professionals' availability and opportunity for personal contact; (3) feedback, teaching and protocols related to handovers; (4) information technology facilitated communication solutions; and (5) the role and responsibility of patients. Our analysis suggests that each healthcare professional attempted to provide the best care possible, but did this largely in isolation, and without the benefit of the knowledge and expertise of the other members of the microsystem.

Conclusions: The microsystem approach offers an innovative organisational construct and approach to assess the gaps in 'hospital to community' patient handovers, by viewing the hospital to the community interface as a clinical microsystem continuum. Our application of the microsystem approach confirms and extends earlier findings about the impact of barriers on the continuity and safety of patient transitions and their impact on the quality of patient care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
First case study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Second case study.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. de Vries E, Ramrattan M, Smorenburg S, et al. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:216–23 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wagner C, de Bruijne M. Onbedoelde schade in Nederlandse Ziekenhuizen. EMGO Instituut en NIVEL, 2007
    1. Zegers M, de Bruijne MC, Wagner C, et al. Adverse events and potentially preventable deaths in Dutch hospitals: results of a retrospective patient record review study. Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:297–302 - PubMed
    1. Wachter RM. The end of the beginning: patient safety five years after ‘to err is human’. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004;(Suppl Web Exclusives):W4-534.– - PubMed
    1. Wachter RM. Patient safety at ten: unmistakable progress, troubling gaps. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:165–73 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms