Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;50(12):1029-36.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318269e0b2.

The association of complementary and alternative medicine use and health care expenditures for back and neck problems

Affiliations

The association of complementary and alternative medicine use and health care expenditures for back and neck problems

Brook I Martin et al. Med Care. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Health care costs associated with use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by patients with spine problems have not been studied in a national sample.

Objectives: To estimate the total and spine-specific medical expenditures among CAM and non-CAM users with spine problems.

Research design: Analysis of the 2002-2008 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

Subjects: Adults (above 17 y) with self-reported neck and back problems who did or did not use CAM services.

Measures: Survey-weighted generalized linear regression and propensity matching to examine expenditure differences between CAM users and non-CAM users while controlling for patient, socioeconomic, and health characteristics.

Results: A total of 12,036 respondents with spine problems were included, including 4306 (35.8%) CAM users (40.8% in weighted sample). CAM users had significantly better self-reported health, education, and comorbidity compared with non-CAM users. Adjusted annual medical costs among CAM users was $424 lower (95% confidence interval: $240, $609; P<0.001) for spine-related costs, and $796 lower (95% confidence interval: $121, $1470; P = 0.021) for total health care cost than among non-CAM users. Average expenditure for CAM users, based on propensity matching, was $526 lower for spine-specific costs (P<0.001) and $298 lower for total health costs (P = 0.403). Expenditure differences were primarily due to lower inpatient expenditures among CAM users.

Conclusions: CAM users did not add to the overall medical spending in a nationally representative sample with neck and back problems. As the causal associations remain unclear in these cross-sectional data, future research exploring these cost differences might benefit from research designs that minimize confounding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Weighted and unweighted sample, selection, and exclusion of CAM and non-CAM users with self-reported back and neck problems in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2002–2008.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kaptchuk TJ, Eisenberg DM. Varieties of healing. 2: a taxonomy of unconventional healing practices. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(3):196–204. - PubMed
    1. Eisenberg DM, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA. 1998;280(18):1569–75. - PubMed
    1. Nahin RL, et al. Costs of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and frequency of visits to CAM practitioners: United States, 2007. Natl Health Stat Report. 2009;(18):1–14. - PubMed
    1. Pelletier KR, Astin JA. Integration and reimbursement of complementary and alternative medicine by managed care and insurance providers: 2000 update and cohort analysis. Altern Ther Health Med. 2002;8(1):38–9. 42, 44. passim. - PubMed
    1. Davis MA, Sirovich BE, Weeks WB. Utilization and expenditures on chiropractic care in the United States from 1997 to 2006. Health Serv Res. 2010;45(3):748–61. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types