Incorporating patients' preferences into medical decision making
- PMID: 23132890
- PMCID: PMC3653614
- DOI: 10.1177/1077558712461283
Incorporating patients' preferences into medical decision making
Abstract
Current models of care emphasize the importance of including patients' values in the decision-making process. This is particularly important for decisions for which there are few data supporting a clear strategy or treatment choice. Constructing preferences for complex decisions requires that patients be able to consider multiple trade-offs between specific risks and benefits. Several marketing research techniques have been recently applied to heath care settings to facilitate this process. Most can be programmed to generate patients' preferences or priorities, which can then be used to improve patient-physician communication. In this article, we will describe some of the currently available approaches that have been successfully used in the health care setting. We provide case examples to illustrate the potential value of adopting each of these approaches in clinical practice.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Patient preferences versus physicians' judgement: does it make a difference in healthcare decision making?Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Jun;11(3):163-80. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0023-3. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013. PMID: 23529716 Review.
-
Shared decision making about palliative chemotherapy: A qualitative observation of talk about patients' preferences.Palliat Med. 2017 Jul;31(7):625-633. doi: 10.1177/0269216316676010. Epub 2016 Oct 26. Palliat Med. 2017. PMID: 28618897
-
Patient centered decision making: use of conjoint analysis to determine risk-benefit trade-offs for preference sensitive treatment choices.J Neurol Sci. 2014 Sep 15;344(1-2):80-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.06.030. Epub 2014 Jun 23. J Neurol Sci. 2014. PMID: 25037284
-
Supporting shared decisions when clinical evidence is low.Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Feb;70(1 Suppl):113S-128S. doi: 10.1177/1077558712458456. Epub 2012 Nov 1. Med Care Res Rev. 2013. PMID: 23124616
-
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003. PMID: 14698953 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient Preferences in Metastatic Breast Cancer Care: A Scoping Review.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 30;15(17):4331. doi: 10.3390/cancers15174331. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37686607 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What influences slum residents' choices of healthcare providers for common illnesses? Findings of a Discrete Choice Experiment in Ibadan, Nigeria.PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Mar 13;3(3):e0001664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001664. eCollection 2023. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36963060 Free PMC article.
-
Best-Worst Scaling Survey of Inpatients' Preferences in Medical Decision-Making Participation in China.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 21;11(3):323. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030323. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36766897 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of a Community Health Worker-Led Intervention on Knowledge, Perception, and Prostate Cancer Screening among Men in Rural Kenya.Adv Prev Med. 2022 Aug 8;2022:4621446. doi: 10.1155/2022/4621446. eCollection 2022. Adv Prev Med. 2022. PMID: 35979267 Free PMC article.
-
Goal attainment scaling for patients with low back pain in rehabilitation: A systematic review.Health Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 22;4(3):e378. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.378. eCollection 2021 Sep. Health Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34589616 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Badia X, Roset M, Herdman M. Inconsistent responses in three preference-elicitation methods for health states. Social Science & Medicine. 1999;49(7):943–950. - PubMed
-
- Burge P, Devlin N, Appleby J, Rohr C, Grant J. Do patients always prefer quicker treatment?: a discrete choice analysis of patients’ stated preferences in the London Patient Choice Project. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t] Applied Health Economics & Health Policy. 3(4):183–194. - PubMed
-
- Cook KF, Ashton CM, Byrne MM, Brody B, Geraci J, Giesler RB, Wray NP. A psychometric analysis of the measurement level of the rating scale, time tradeoff, and standard gamble. Social Science & Medicine. 2001;53(10):1275–1285. - PubMed
-
- Cotler SJ, Patil R, McNUtt RA, Speroff T, Banaad-Omiotek G, Ganger DR, Jensen DM. Patients’ values for health states associated with hepatitis C and physicians’ estimates of those values. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2730–2736. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
