Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb;70(1 Suppl):80S-93S.
doi: 10.1177/1077558712461283. Epub 2012 Nov 6.

Incorporating patients' preferences into medical decision making

Affiliations

Incorporating patients' preferences into medical decision making

Liana Fraenkel. Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Current models of care emphasize the importance of including patients' values in the decision-making process. This is particularly important for decisions for which there are few data supporting a clear strategy or treatment choice. Constructing preferences for complex decisions requires that patients be able to consider multiple trade-offs between specific risks and benefits. Several marketing research techniques have been recently applied to heath care settings to facilitate this process. Most can be programmed to generate patients' preferences or priorities, which can then be used to improve patient-physician communication. In this article, we will describe some of the currently available approaches that have been successfully used in the health care setting. We provide case examples to illustrate the potential value of adopting each of these approaches in clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of ACA relative importance question
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of a paired comparison task
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of handout illustrating a hypothetical respondent’s preferences
Figure 4
Figure 4
Example of a Choice Based Conjoint Analysis task
Figure 5
Figure 5
Example of a Best Worse Scaling question

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Badia X, Roset M, Herdman M. Inconsistent responses in three preference-elicitation methods for health states. Social Science & Medicine. 1999;49(7):943–950. - PubMed
    1. Burge P, Devlin N, Appleby J, Rohr C, Grant J. Do patients always prefer quicker treatment?: a discrete choice analysis of patients’ stated preferences in the London Patient Choice Project. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t] Applied Health Economics & Health Policy. 3(4):183–194. - PubMed
    1. Christofides NJ, Muirhead D, Jewkes RK, Penn-Kekana L, Conco DN. Women’s experiences of and preferences for services after rape in South Africa: interview study. [Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t] BMJ. 332(7535):209–213. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cook KF, Ashton CM, Byrne MM, Brody B, Geraci J, Giesler RB, Wray NP. A psychometric analysis of the measurement level of the rating scale, time tradeoff, and standard gamble. Social Science & Medicine. 2001;53(10):1275–1285. - PubMed
    1. Cotler SJ, Patil R, McNUtt RA, Speroff T, Banaad-Omiotek G, Ganger DR, Jensen DM. Patients’ values for health states associated with hepatitis C and physicians’ estimates of those values. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2730–2736. - PubMed

Publication types