Long-term clinical and radiological results of endovascular internal trapping in vertebral artery dissection
- PMID: 23149552
- DOI: 10.1007/s00234-012-1114-9
Long-term clinical and radiological results of endovascular internal trapping in vertebral artery dissection
Abstract
Introduction: Previous reports have suggested that endovascular parent artery occlusion is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of vertebral artery dissection (VAD). However, the results of long-term outcomes are still unclear. This study reviewed the clinical and imaging outcomes of patients with VAD treated by endovascular internal trapping.
Methods: A total of 73 patients were treated for VAD by endovascular internal trapping between March 1998 and March 2011. Patients were regularly followed up by magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance angiography, and clinical examinations. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the modified Rankin Scale.
Results: Forty-five patients had ruptured VADs, and 28 had unruptured VADs. Clinical follow-up of at least 6 months data was obtained for 61 patients (83.6 %). The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 145 months (mean ± SD, 55.6 ± 8.9 months). Two patients with ruptured VADs had recurrence (2.74 %). Cranial nerve paresis (CNP) was observed in six patients (8.21 %), spinal cord infarction in two patients (2.74 %), and a perforating artery ischemia was diagnosed in seven patients (9.59 %); all patients with CNP and five of the patients with partial Wallenberg syndrome experienced only temporary symptoms; two of the patients with partial Wallenberg syndrome had permanent neurological deficits. Despite their symptoms, most patients were in good general condition, as shown by their clinical scores.
Conclusions: The results of this study have proven that endovascular internal trapping is a stable and durable treatment for closure of VADs. Recanalization is rather rare and occurred only in ruptured cases, both within 3 months after initial treatment without rupture. CNPs were observed in 8.21 %, perforating ischemia in 9.59 %, and spinal cord infarction in 2.74 %. The former two are temporary, while the last can be a factor that affects the modified Rankin Scale. Patients rated their quality of life as good, as corroborated by their posttreatment clinical score. Endovascular internal trapping for VAD is a therapy with a satisfactory long-term outcome.
Similar articles
-
Endovascular treatment of acute intracranial vertebral artery dissection: long-term follow-up results of internal trapping and reconstructive treatment using coils and stents.J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Nov;7(11):829-34. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011366. Epub 2014 Sep 18. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015. PMID: 25237069
-
Medullary infarction as a poor prognostic factor after internal coil trapping of a ruptured vertebral artery dissection.J Neurosurg. 2013 Jan;118(1):131-9. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.JNS12566. Epub 2012 Oct 5. J Neurosurg. 2013. PMID: 23039149
-
Endovascular treatment for ruptured and unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms: a meta-analysis.J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Jun;9(6):558-563. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012309. Epub 2016 May 24. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017. PMID: 27220870
-
Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissection.J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2021;15(5):265-280. doi: 10.5797/jnet.ra.2020-0150. Epub 2021 Jan 11. J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2021. PMID: 37501904 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Endovascular stenting of extracranial carotid and vertebral artery dissections: a systematic review of the literature.Neurosurgery. 2011 Apr;68(4):856-66; discussion 866. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318209ce03. Neurosurgery. 2011. PMID: 21242839 Review.
Cited by
-
Spinal Cord Infarction after Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2021;15(8):540-545. doi: 10.5797/jnet.cr.2020-0094. Epub 2020 Dec 29. J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2021. PMID: 37502759 Free PMC article.
-
Endovascular treatment of intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm, a case series study with two years follow up on complications.Heliyon. 2023 Apr 19;9(5):e15568. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15568. eCollection 2023 May. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 37153412 Free PMC article.
-
Severe Complications After Endovascular Trapping of Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm: Simultaneous Occurrence of Medullary and Cervical Spinal Cord Infarction.Cureus. 2022 Feb 4;14(2):e21916. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21916. eCollection 2022 Feb. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35265433 Free PMC article.
-
ESO guideline for the management of extracranial and intracranial artery dissection.Eur Stroke J. 2021 Sep;6(3):XXXIX-LXXXVIII. doi: 10.1177/23969873211046475. Epub 2021 Oct 13. Eur Stroke J. 2021. PMID: 34746432 Free PMC article.
-
Angiographic characteristics of ruptured versus unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm.J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2022 Mar;24(1):10-15. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2021.E2021.06.012. Epub 2021 Oct 26. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2022. PMID: 34695886 Free PMC article.
