Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;103(1):120-6.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300853. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

Association between community socioeconomic position and HIV diagnosis rate among adults and adolescents in the United States, 2005 to 2009

Affiliations

Association between community socioeconomic position and HIV diagnosis rate among adults and adolescents in the United States, 2005 to 2009

Qian An et al. Am J Public Health. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: We examined the association between socioeconomic position (SEP) and HIV diagnosis rates in the United States and whether racial/ethnic disparities in diagnosis rates persist after control for SEP.

Methods: We used cases of HIV infection among persons aged 13 years and older, diagnosed 2005 through 2009 in 37 states and reported to national HIV surveillance through June 2010, and US Census data, to examine associations between county-level SEP measures and 5-year average annual HIV diagnosis rates overall and among race/ethnicity-sex groups.

Results: The HIV diagnosis rate was significantly higher for individuals in the low-SEP tertile than for those in the high-SEP tertile (rate ratios for low- vs high-SEP tertiles range = 1.68-3.38) except for White males and Hispanic females. The SEP disparities were larger for minorities than for Whites. Racial disparities persisted after we controlled for SEP, urbanicity, and percentage of population aged 20 to 50 years, and were high in the low-SEP tertile for males and in low- and high-SEP tertiles for females.

Conclusions: Findings support continued prioritization of HIV testing, prevention, and treatment to persons in economically deprived areas, and Blacks of all SEP levels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kawachi I, Kennedy PB. Socioeconomic determinants of health: health and social cohesion: why care about income inequality? BMJ. 1997;314(7086):1037–1040 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh GK, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Edwards BK. Persistent area socioeconomic disparities in US incidence of cervical cancer, mortality, stage and survival, 1975–2000. Cancer. 2004;101(5):1051–1057 - PubMed
    1. Merkin SS, Stevenson L, Powe N. Geographic socioeconomic status, race and advanced-stage breast cancer in New York City. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(1):64–70 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Soobader MJ, Subramanian SV, Carson R. Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter?—The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156(5):471–482 - PubMed
    1. Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Rehkopf DH, Subramanian SV. Race/ethnicity, gender and monitoring socioeconomic gradients in health: a comparison of area-based socioeconomic measures—The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(10):1655–1671 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources