The assessment of performance and self-report validity in persons claiming pain-related disability

Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;27(1):108-37. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2012.739646. Epub 2012 Nov 16.

Abstract

One third of all people will experience spinal pain in their lifetime and half of these will experience chronic pain. Pain often occurs in the context of a legally compensable event with back pain being the most common reason for filing a Workers Compensation claim in the United States. When financial incentives to appear disabled exist, malingered pain-related disability is a potential problem. Malingering may take the form of exaggerated physical, emotional, or cognitive symptoms and/or under-performance on measures of cognitive and physical capacity. Essential to the accurate detection of Malingered Pain-related Disability is the understanding that malingering is an act of will, the goal of which is to increase the appearance of disability beyond that which would naturally arise from the injury in question. This paper will review a number of Symptom Validity Tests (SVTs) that have been developed to detect malingering in patients claiming pain-related disability and will conclude with a review of studies showing the diagnostic benefit of combining SVT findings from a comprehensive malingering assessment. The utilization of a variety of tools sensitive to the multiple manifestations of malingering increases the odds of detecting invalid claims while reducing the risk of rejecting a valid claim.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Diagnostic Self Evaluation*
  • Disability Evaluation*
  • Humans
  • Malingering / diagnosis*
  • Malingering / psychology
  • Pain / diagnosis*
  • Pain / psychology
  • Persons with Disabilities / psychology
  • Physical Examination
  • Self Report
  • United States
  • Workers' Compensation