Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 May;208(5):343-53.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.11.013. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

A systematic review of randomized trials assessing human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening

Affiliations
Review

A systematic review of randomized trials assessing human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening

Insiyyah Y Patanwala et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May.

Abstract

Our objective was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for cervical cancer screening in randomized trials. We conducted a systematic literature search of the following databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Cochrane. Eligible studies were randomized trials comparing HPV-based to cytology-based screening strategies, with disease status determined by colposcopy/biopsy for participants with positive results. Disease rates (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN]2 or greater and CIN3 or greater), sensitivity, and positive predictive value were abstracted or calculated from the articles. Six studies met inclusion criteria. Relative sensitivities for detecting CIN3 or greater of HPV testing-based strategies vs cytology ranged from 0.8 to 2.1. The main limitation of our study was that testing methodologies and screening/management protocols were highly variable across studies. Screening strategies in which a single initial HPV-positive test led to colposcopy were more sensitive than cytology but resulted in higher colposcopy rates. These results have implications for cotesting with HPV and cytology as recommended in the United States.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1. Strategies for incorporating HPV testing into cervical cancer screening
Studies used different strategies for incorporating HPV testing into cervical cancer screening and for responding to positive HPV test results. HPV, human papillomavirus. *Refer to Table 1 for colposcopy thresholds for positive cytology results. Patanwala. HPV testing in cervical cancer screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2. Systematic review study selection process
Flow diagram of articles identified and excluded for the systematic review is shown. Patanwala. HPV testing in cervical cancer screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3. Number of colposcopies needed to detect 1 case of CIN2 or greater in round 1
Values are calculated as described in Materials and Methods. CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Patanwala. HPV testing in cervical cancer screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4. Number of colposcopies needed to detect 1 case of CIN3 or greater in round 1
Values are calculated as described in Materials and Methods. CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Patanwala. HPV testing in cervical cancer screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. US National Institutes of Health. National Cancer Institute [Accessed June 21, 2011];Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results. SEER stat fact sheets: cervix uteri. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/cervix.html.
    1. Gay JD, Donaldson LD, Goellner JR. False-negative results in cervical cytologic studies. Acta Cytol. 1985;29:1043–6. - PubMed
    1. Munoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S, et al. human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:518–27. - PubMed
    1. Moscicki AB, Shiboski S, Broering J, et al. DNA testing in adolescent and young women. J Pediatr. 1998;132:277–84. - PubMed
    1. Moyer VA, on behalf of the US Preventative Services Task Force US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:880–91. W312. - PubMed

MeSH terms