Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in the United States: provider distribution and guidance method, 2001-2010
- PMID: 23169730
- DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.8733
Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in the United States: provider distribution and guidance method, 2001-2010
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the utilization by specialty and guidance method for vertebral augmentation (including vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty) in the United States from 2001 to 2010.
Materials and methods: Using the 2001 through 2010 United States part B Medicare claims database, we studied the CPT-4 (Current Procedural Terminology, 4th ed.) codes used for thoracic (22520) and lumbar (22521) vertebroplasty, thoracic (22523) and lumbar (22524) kyphoplasty, and the method of radiologic guidance (76012 for fluoroscopy and 76013 for CT). For each of these codes, volume and physician specialty were tabulated.
Results: Radiologists performed 73% of Medicare-reimbursed vertebroplasty procedures in the United States in 2001-2010 and 30% of kyphoplasty procedures from 2006 to 2010. The majority were performed by nonradiologists, most notably orthopedic surgeons, who accounted for 40%. Although there was a decrease in utilization of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty from 2009 to 2010, the number of vertebroplasties increased by 72.9% from 2001 to 2010, and the number of kyphoplasties increased by 12.0% from 2006 to 2010. Fluoroscopy is nearly universal as a guidance method for both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.
Conclusion: This study shows that despite controversy regarding the long-term efficacy of vertebral augmentation, including vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, utilization has risen since these procedures have been instituted and fluoroscopy is nearly universal as a guidance method. For vertebroplasty, the decrease in utilization from 2007 to 2009 may be explained in part by a combination of the initiation of kyphoplasty codes in 2006 and the August 2009 Kallmes et al. and Buchbinder et al. publications. Decreased utilization of both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty from 2009 to 2010 may also be partly due to these publications.
Similar articles
-
Vertebroplasty in the United States: guidance method and provider distribution, 2001-2003.Radiology. 2007 Apr;243(1):166-70. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2431060045. Radiology. 2007. PMID: 17392252
-
Analysis of utilization patterns of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in the Medicare population.J Neurointerv Surg. 2013 Sep 1;5(5):467-72. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010337. Epub 2012 Jul 7. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013. PMID: 22773335
-
Trends of utilization and physician payments for vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty procedures by physician specialty and practice setting: 2010 to 2018.Spine J. 2020 Oct;20(10):1659-1665. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 May 14. Spine J. 2020. PMID: 32417502 Clinical Trial.
-
Utilization of Vertebral Augmentation Procedures in the USA: a Comparative Analysis in Medicare Fee-for-Service Population Pre- and Post-2009 Trials.Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020 Apr 14;24(5):22. doi: 10.1007/s11916-020-00850-2. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020. PMID: 32291587 Review.
-
Percutaneous vertebral augmentation: the status of vertebroplasty and current controversies.Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2011 Apr;15(2):117-24. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1275594. Epub 2011 Apr 15. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2011. PMID: 21500131 Review.
Cited by
-
Vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fracture.RMD Open. 2021 Jun;7(2):e001655. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001655. RMD Open. 2021. PMID: 34193518 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Application of Medicare Data for Musculoskeletal Research in the United States: A Systematic Review.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019 Jul 1;27(13):e622-e632. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00297. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019. PMID: 31232800 Free PMC article.
-
Review of Vertebral Augmentation: An Updated Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness.Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Aug 15;12(3):295-321. doi: 10.14444/5036. eCollection 2018 Jun. Int J Spine Surg. 2018. PMID: 30276087 Free PMC article.
-
What is the role of vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic fractures? A review of the recent literature.Neuroradiology. 2018 Aug;60(8):777-783. doi: 10.1007/s00234-018-2042-0. Epub 2018 Jun 13. Neuroradiology. 2018. PMID: 29947942 Review.
-
Percutaneous cement augmentation techniques for osteoporotic spinal fractures.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013 Oct;39(5):445-53. doi: 10.1007/s00068-013-0265-7. Epub 2013 Feb 20. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013. PMID: 26815439
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
