Appropriate follow up to detect potential adverse events after initiation of select contraceptive methods: a systematic review
- PMID: 23177264
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.09.017
Appropriate follow up to detect potential adverse events after initiation of select contraceptive methods: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: After a woman initiates certain methods of contraception [e.g., hormonal methods, intrauterine devices (IUDs)], she is generally asked to return at some interval for a follow-up visit; however, is it unclear whether follow up is needed, what an appropriate follow-up schedule is and what should be done at follow-up visits.
Methods: We conducted four separate searches in the PubMed database for all peer-reviewed articles in any language published from database inception through April 2012 that examined the following health outcomes for combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs), IUDs or medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA): (a) incidence of hypertension among women who began using a CHC compared to women not using a CHC; (b) incidence of migraine among women who began using a CHC compared to women not using a CHC; (c) incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) among women who began using an IUD compared to women who started another form or used no method of contraception or examined incidence of PID at two or more time periods after IUD insertion and (d) whether initial weight gain predicts future weight gain among women who began using DMPA. The quality of each study was assessed using the United States Preventive Services Task Force grading system.
Results: A total of 15 studies met our inclusion criteria: 5 examined hypertension and combined oral contraceptive (COC) use, 7 examined PID and IUD use and 3 examined weight gain after DMPA initiation. No studies that examined migraine after CHC initiation met our inclusion criteria. Few women developed hypertension after initiating COCs, and studies examining increases in blood pressure after COC initiation found mixed results (Level I, fair to II-2, fair). Among women who had a copper IUD inserted, there was little difference in incidence of PID, or IUD removal for PID, compared with women who initiated DMPA, a hormone-releasing IUD, or COCs (Level I, good to Level II-2, fair). Studies that examined when women were diagnosed with PID after IUD insertion found mixed results. The study with the largest sample size found a much greater incidence of PID in the first 20 days after insertion, with very low rates of PID up to 8 years postinsertion (Level I, good to Level II-3, poor). Studies that examined weight gain after DMPA initiation found that weight gain >5% of baseline weight at 6 months was associated with greater mean change in weight and greater mean change in body mass index at follow-up times ranging from 12 to 36 months (Level II-2, fair to Level II-3, fair).
Conclusions: Evidence on select adverse events associated with initiation of contraceptive use is limited but does not suggest increased risk of hypertension among COC users or increased risk of PID among IUD users. DMPA users who gain >5% of baseline body weight may be at increased risk of future weight gain.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
-
The safety of intrauterine devices among young women: a systematic review.Contraception. 2017 Jan;95(1):17-39. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 19. Contraception. 2017. PMID: 27771475 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Retention of intrauterine devices in women who acquire pelvic inflammatory disease: a systematic review.Contraception. 2013 May;87(5):655-60. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.011. Epub 2012 Oct 4. Contraception. 2013. PMID: 23040135 Review.
-
Current status of intrauterine devices. II. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease and ectopic pregnancy.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1982 Jan;37(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/00006254-198201000-00001. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1982. PMID: 7054735
-
Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective.Lancet. 1992 Mar 28;339(8796):785-8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91904-m. Lancet. 1992. PMID: 1347812 Clinical Trial.
-
Does infection occur with modern intrauterine devices?Lancet. 1992 Mar 28;339(8796):783-4. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91902-k. Lancet. 1992. PMID: 1347810
Cited by
-
U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2024.MMWR Recomm Rep. 2024 Aug 8;73(3):1-77. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7303a1. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2024. PMID: 39106301 Free PMC article.
-
Oral contraceptives in adolescents: a retrospective population-based study on blood pressure and metabolic dysregulation.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Jul;80(7):1097-1103. doi: 10.1007/s00228-024-03671-z. Epub 2024 Mar 30. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 38554180
-
Current Strategies for Prevention of Infection After Uterine Artery Embolisation.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Jul;45(7):911-917. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03158-3. Epub 2022 May 16. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022. PMID: 35578034 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Adherence to Recommended Practices for Provision of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Providers in a Large U.S. Health Care System.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Dec;29(12):1586-1595. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8169. Epub 2020 Jul 13. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020. PMID: 32667847 Free PMC article.
-
Consensus Statement on the Use of Oral Contraceptive Pills in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Women in India.J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018 Apr-Jun;11(2):96-118. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_72_18. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018. PMID: 30158805 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
