Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;22(4):427-34; quiz 435.
doi: 10.7182/pit2012202.

The interpersonal process in tissue donation requests with "undecided" next of kin

Lindsey Dorflinger  1 , Stephen M Auerbach, Laura A Siminoff
Affiliations

The interpersonal process in tissue donation requests with "undecided" next of kin

Lindsey Dorflinger et al. Prog Transplant. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Context: Although recent studies have demonstrated that tissue requesters' behavior during conversations about tissue donation affects consent rates, the link between requesters' behavior and consent rates remains unclear.

Objective: To examine whether positive/collaborative requester behaviors elicit complementary behaviors from next of kin who were initially undecided about their willingness to donate their deceased family member's tissues.

Design: -Audio recordings of requests were coded to assess for interpersonal behavior of each interactant.

Setting: Audio recordings were gathered from a national sample of tissue banks.

Participants: One hundred and two requester-next-of-kin dyads, consisting of 102 relatives and 53 requesters.

Main outcome measures: Tissue requester and next-of-kin affiliation and interpersonal control were assessed. Tissue requesters' persuasion, confirmation (eg, approval, empathy, reassurance) and disapproval, as well as next-of-kin approval and disapproval, were examined.

Results: Tissue requesters and next of kin tended to match one another on affiliation and complement one another on interpersonal control. "Key topics," which may affect the next of kin's decision, are discussed in only about one-third of requests. Next of kin were less affiliative and more disapproving when requesters were also more disapproving. Interpersonal behavior of the tissue requester, such as affiliation, statements of disapproval, and persuasion, as well as discussion of key topics, was a significant predictor of the interpersonal behavior of the next of kin.

Conclusions: Positive requester behaviors elicited a positive response from undecided next of kin. Because many next of kin have limited knowledge about tissue donation before the request, the communication process may affect the next of kin's perceptions of donation and thus affect the likelihood of consent. Findings could potentially inform communication skills training for tissue requesters; future research could examine effects of such training on consent rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Siminoff LA, Marshall HM, Dumenci L, Bowen G, Swaminathan A, Gordon N. Communicating effectively about donation: an educational intervention to increase consent to donation. Prog Transplant. 2009;19(1):35–43. - PubMed
    1. Bires MH. Comparison of consent rates between hospital-based designated requestors and organ procurement coordinators. J Transplant Coord. 1999;9(3):177–180. - PubMed
    1. Tokalak I, Emiroğlu R, Karakayali H, Bilgin N, Haberal M. The importance of continuing education for transplant coordination staff. Prog Transplant. 2005;15(2):106–111. - PubMed
    1. Santiago C, Gomez P, Olivares J, de La Concepcion M. Evaluation of organ procurement in an area under the influence of a training program. Transplant Proc. 2005;37(9):3649–3650. - PubMed
    1. Siminoff LA, Gordon N, Hewlett J, Arnold RM. Factors influencing families’ consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation. JAMA. 2001;286(1):71–77. - PubMed

Publication types