Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May;28(5):637-44.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2283-2. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

Impact of electronic health records on malpractice claims in a sample of physician offices in Colorado: a retrospective cohort study

Affiliations

Impact of electronic health records on malpractice claims in a sample of physician offices in Colorado: a retrospective cohort study

Michael S Victoroff et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 May.

Abstract

Background: Electronic health records (EHRs) might reduce medical liability claims and potentially justify premium credits from liability insurers, but the evidence is limited.

Objectives: To evaluate the association between EHR use and medical liability claims in a population of office-based physicians, including claims that could potentially be directly prevented by features available in EHRs ("EHR-sensitive" claims).

Design: Retrospective cohort study of medical liability claims and analysis of claim abstracts.

Participants: The 26 % of Colorado office-based physicians insured through COPIC Insurance Company who responded to a survey on EHR use (894 respondents out of 3,502 invitees).

Main measures: Claims incidence rate ratio (IRR); prevalence of "EHR-sensitive" claims.

Key results: 473 physicians (53 % of respondents) used an office-based EHR. After adjustment for sex, birth cohort, specialty, practice setting and use of an EHR in settings other than an office, IRR for all claims was not significantly different between EHR users and non-users (0.88, 95 % CI 0.52-1.46; p = 0.61), or for users after EHR implementation as compared to before (0.73, 95 % CI 0.41-1.29; p = 0.28). Of 1,569 claim abstracts reviewed, 3 % were judged "Plausibly EHR-sensitive," 82 % "Unlikely EHR-sensitive," and 15 % "Unable to determine." EHR-sensitive claims occurred in six out of 633 non-users and two out of 251 EHR users. Incidence rate ratios were 0.01 for both groups.

Conclusions: Colorado physicians using office-based EHRs did not have significantly different rates of liability claims than non-EHR users; nor were rates different for EHR users before and after EHR implementation. The lack of significant effect may be due to a low prevalence of EHR-sensitive claims. Further research on EHR use and medical liability across a larger population of physicians is warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flow diagram.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, 42 U.S.C. § 17921 et seq.(2009).
    1. Hsiao C-J HE, Socey TC, Cai B. Electronic medical record/Electronic health record systems of office-based physicians: United States, 2009 and Preliminary 2010 State Estimates. Health E-Stat. 2010.
    1. Amarasingham R, Plantinga L, Diener-West M, Gaskin DJ, Powe NR. Clinical information technologies and inpatient outcomes: a multiple hospital study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(2):108–114. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.520. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bright TJ WA, Dhurjati R, et al. Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(1):29–43. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-1-201207030-00450. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dorr D, Bonner LM, Cohen AN, et al. Informatics systems to promote improved care for chronic illness: a literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(2):156–163. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2255. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources