Impact of electronic health records on malpractice claims in a sample of physician offices in Colorado: a retrospective cohort study
- PMID: 23192449
- PMCID: PMC3631062
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2283-2
Impact of electronic health records on malpractice claims in a sample of physician offices in Colorado: a retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Background: Electronic health records (EHRs) might reduce medical liability claims and potentially justify premium credits from liability insurers, but the evidence is limited.
Objectives: To evaluate the association between EHR use and medical liability claims in a population of office-based physicians, including claims that could potentially be directly prevented by features available in EHRs ("EHR-sensitive" claims).
Design: Retrospective cohort study of medical liability claims and analysis of claim abstracts.
Participants: The 26 % of Colorado office-based physicians insured through COPIC Insurance Company who responded to a survey on EHR use (894 respondents out of 3,502 invitees).
Main measures: Claims incidence rate ratio (IRR); prevalence of "EHR-sensitive" claims.
Key results: 473 physicians (53 % of respondents) used an office-based EHR. After adjustment for sex, birth cohort, specialty, practice setting and use of an EHR in settings other than an office, IRR for all claims was not significantly different between EHR users and non-users (0.88, 95 % CI 0.52-1.46; p = 0.61), or for users after EHR implementation as compared to before (0.73, 95 % CI 0.41-1.29; p = 0.28). Of 1,569 claim abstracts reviewed, 3 % were judged "Plausibly EHR-sensitive," 82 % "Unlikely EHR-sensitive," and 15 % "Unable to determine." EHR-sensitive claims occurred in six out of 633 non-users and two out of 251 EHR users. Incidence rate ratios were 0.01 for both groups.
Conclusions: Colorado physicians using office-based EHRs did not have significantly different rates of liability claims than non-EHR users; nor were rates different for EHR users before and after EHR implementation. The lack of significant effect may be due to a low prevalence of EHR-sensitive claims. Further research on EHR use and medical liability across a larger population of physicians is warranted.
Comment in
-
Capsule commentary on Victoroff et al., impact of electronic health records on malpractice claims in a sample of physician offices in Colorado: a retrospective cohort study.J Gen Intern Med. 2013 May;28(5):707. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2403-7. J Gen Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23475643 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Capsule commentary on Victoroff et al., impact of electronic health records on malpractice claims in a sample of physician offices in Colorado: a retrospective cohort study.J Gen Intern Med. 2013 May;28(5):707. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2403-7. J Gen Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23475643 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Electronic health records and malpractice claims in office practice.Arch Intern Med. 2008 Nov 24;168(21):2362-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.21.2362. Arch Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 19029502
-
An epidemiologic study of closed emergency department malpractice claims in a national database of physician malpractice insurers.Acad Emerg Med. 2010 May;17(5):553-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00729.x. Acad Emerg Med. 2010. PMID: 20536812
-
Medical malpractice in gastroenterology.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Jun;6(6):677-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.02.047. Epub 2008 May 5. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008. PMID: 18456572 Review.
-
Review of Neurosurgery Medical Professional Liability Claims in the United States.Neurosurgery. 2018 Nov 1;83(5):997-1006. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx565. Neurosurgery. 2018. PMID: 29325137 Review.
Cited by
-
Closed-Loop Medication Management with an Electronic Health Record System in U.S. and Finnish Hospitals.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 30;20(17):6680. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20176680. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37681820 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Digital health technology-specific risks for medical malpractice liability.NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Oct 20;5(1):157. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00698-3. NPJ Digit Med. 2022. PMID: 36261469 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of health information technology on malpractice insurance premiums.Healthc Inform Res. 2015 Apr;21(2):118-24. doi: 10.4258/hir.2015.21.2.118. Epub 2015 Apr 30. Healthc Inform Res. 2015. PMID: 25995964 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of electronic health record implementation in ophthalmology at an academic medical center (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2013 Sep;111:70-92. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2013. PMID: 24167326 Free PMC article.
-
Capsule commentary on Victoroff et al., impact of electronic health records on malpractice claims in a sample of physician offices in Colorado: a retrospective cohort study.J Gen Intern Med. 2013 May;28(5):707. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2403-7. J Gen Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23475643 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, 42 U.S.C. § 17921 et seq.(2009).
-
- Hsiao C-J HE, Socey TC, Cai B. Electronic medical record/Electronic health record systems of office-based physicians: United States, 2009 and Preliminary 2010 State Estimates. Health E-Stat. 2010.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
