Abstract
This article discusses the rationale behind recommending immunopharmacological guidance of long-term therapies with genetically engineered anti-TNF-α immunoglobulin constructs. Arguments why therapeutic decision-making should not rely on clinical outcome alone are presented. Central to this is that the use of theranostics (i.e., monitoring circulating levels of functional anti-TNF-α drugs and antidrug antibodies) would markedly improve treatment because therapies can be tailored to individual patients and provide more effective and economical long-term therapies with minimal risk of side effects. Large-scale immunopharmacological knowledge of how patients 'handle' TNF-α biopharmaceuticals would also help industry develop more effective and safer TNF-α inhibitors.
Publication types
-
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
-
Review
MeSH terms
-
Adalimumab
-
Animals
-
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal / therapeutic use*
-
Antibodies, Monoclonal / therapeutic use*
-
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized / therapeutic use*
-
Autoimmune Diseases / drug therapy*
-
Autoimmune Diseases / immunology
-
Biological Therapy*
-
Clinical Trials as Topic
-
Etanercept
-
Evidence-Based Medicine
-
Humans
-
Immunoglobulin G / therapeutic use*
-
Infliximab
-
Monitoring, Physiologic
-
Precision Medicine
-
Protein Engineering
-
Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor / therapeutic use*
-
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha / antagonists & inhibitors*
Substances
-
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
-
Antibodies, Monoclonal
-
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
-
Immunoglobulin G
-
Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor
-
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha
-
Infliximab
-
Adalimumab
-
Etanercept