Long-term outcomes of older diabetic patients after percutaneous coronary stenting in the United States: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2004 to 2008
- PMID: 23194940
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.993
Long-term outcomes of older diabetic patients after percutaneous coronary stenting in the United States: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2004 to 2008
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to characterize long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly diabetic patients in routine practice.
Background: Although drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in diabetic patients is common practice, pivotal randomized trials enrolled <2,500 diabetic patients, most of whom were <65 years of age.
Methods: Data from 405,679 patients ≥65 years old (33% had diabetes mellitus, of whom 9.8% had insulin-treated diabetes mellitus [ITDM], and 23.3% had noninsulin-treated diabetes mellitus [NITDM]) undergoing PCI from 2004 to 2008 at 946 U.S. hospitals were linked with Medicare inpatient claims data.
Results: Over 18.4 months median follow-up (25th to 75th percentile: 8.0 to 30.8 months), ITDM/NITDM were associated with significantly increased adjusted hazards of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.91 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.86 to 1.96], p < 0.001/HR: 1.32 [95% CI: 1.29 to 1.35], p < 0.001) and myocardial infarction (HR: 1.87 [95% CI: 1.79 to 1.95], p < 0.001/HR: 1.29 [95% CI: 1.25 to 1.34], p < 0.001) compared with nondiabetic patients. The adjusted hazard of undergoing additional revascularization procedures (HR: 1.14 [95% CI: 1.10 to 1.18, p < 0.001/HR: 1.08 [95% CI: 1.05 to 1.10], p < 0.001) and subsequent hospitalization for bleeding (HR: 1.40 [95% CI: 1.31 to 1.50], p < 0.001/HR: 1.18 [95% CI: 1.13 to 1.24], p < 0.001) were also significantly increased. Compared with nondiabetic patients, there were similar excess risks associated with ITDM/NITDM in patients selected for DES and BMS use; selection for use of DES was associated with reductions in death in ITDM/NITDM and myocardial infarction in ITDM, but not NITDM. There were no significant interactions between diabetes status and stent type for revascularization or bleeding.
Conclusions: One-third of older patients undergoing PCI have diabetes. After adjustment for other comorbidities, diabetes, particularly ITDM, remains independently and strongly associated with increased long-term adverse events after both DES and BMS implantation.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Comparative effectiveness of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in elderly patients undergoing revascularization of chronic total coronary occlusions: results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2005-2008.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Oct;5(10):1054-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.05.017. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012. PMID: 23078736
-
Comparative effectiveness of drug-eluting stents on long-term outcomes in elderly patients treated for in-stent restenosis: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;83(2):171-81. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25108. Epub 2013 Aug 31. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 23907981
-
Short- and long-term outcomes of coronary stenting in women versus men: results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services cohort.Circulation. 2012 Oct 30;126(18):2190-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.111369. Epub 2012 Sep 17. Circulation. 2012. PMID: 22988009
-
Stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and death after drug-eluting and bare-metal stent coronary interventions.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jul 31;50(5):463-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.002. Epub 2007 Jun 29. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17662400 Review.
-
Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes in patients with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes mellitus and patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus following percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Nov 25;16(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0422-0. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016. PMID: 27887590 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Why can primary angioplastics be ineffective despite the precocity of the intervention?Eur Heart J Suppl. 2022 Nov 12;24(Suppl I):I114-I118. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac102. eCollection 2022 Nov. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2022. PMID: 36380792 Free PMC article.
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention for left main stem disease: Impact of diabetes mellitus on mortality.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct 1;96(4):E416-E422. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28818. Epub 2020 Mar 5. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 32134178 Free PMC article.
-
Mortality after percutaneous coronary revascularization: Prior cardiovascular risk factor control and improved outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 1;89(7):1195-1204. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26882. Epub 2016 Dec 28. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 28029209 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and efficacy of percutaneous mitral valve repair using the MitraClip® system in patients with diabetes mellitus.PLoS One. 2014 Nov 6;9(11):e111178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111178. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25375257 Free PMC article.
-
National trends in utilization and outcomes of coronary revascularization procedures among people with and without type 2 diabetes in Spain (2001-2011).Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014 Jan 3;13:3. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-13-3. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014. PMID: 24383412 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
