Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;27(2):76-9.
doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827d7a92.

Assessment of presurgical psychological screening in patients undergoing spine surgery: use and clinical impact

Affiliations

Assessment of presurgical psychological screening in patients undergoing spine surgery: use and clinical impact

Arthur K Young et al. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Study design: Prospective survey.

Objective: To determine the prevalence of use of presurgical psychological screening (PPS) among spine surgeons in the United States, identify factors associated with PPS use, evaluate surgeons' opinions of PPS, and investigate how PPS is applied in clinical practice.

Summary of background data: The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends PPS for patients undergoing back surgery. The prevalence of PPS is unknown. Thus, it may be difficult to improve preoperative care for such patients with psychological conditions.

Methods: An online survey invitation was emailed to 340 spine surgeons. Questions addressed surgeon characteristics (eg, number of years in practice), practice characteristics (eg, practice type), inclusion of integrated rehabilitation and psychological services, and use of PPS. The impact of psychological factors on rehabilitation and recovery was assessed using an 11-point Likert scale (0, no impact; 10, highest impact). We analyzed the 110 (32%) responses with a χ(2) test (significance, P<0.05).

Results: PPS was used by 37% (41) to screen for depression (100%) or anxiety (85%). PPS use was highest among surgeons with more experience, higher annual volume, and no university affiliation. Among those screening for fear avoidance, use was highest among surgeons more recently entering the field. Surgeons reported a strong belief regarding the impact of psychological factors on pain relief, adherence to therapy, and return to work (mean impact rating, >7.0); however, impact on return for follow-up was only moderate (mean rating, 5.8).

Conclusions: A minority of surgeons reported using PPS. Surgeons were less likely to use PPS if they had completed residency or begun practice within 14 years, had fewer than 200 cases annually, or were university affiliated. This study highlights the need to advocate for the use of North American Spine Society guidelines regarding the use of PPS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare there were no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. [Accessed on February 23, 2012];Screening for depression. Available at http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspsdepr.htm.
    1. Block AR, Gatchel RJ, Deardorff WW, et al. The mind-body interface: establishing surgical prognosis. In: Block AR, Gatchel RJ, Deardorff WW, et al., editors. The Psychology of Spine Surgery. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2003. pp. 101–114.
    1. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, et al. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:593–602. - PubMed
    1. Grant BF, Hasin DS, Stinson FS, et al. Prevalence, correlates, co-morbidity, and comparative disability of DSM-IV generalized anxiety disorder in the USA: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychol Med. 2005;35:1747–1759. - PubMed
    1. Seekles WM, Cuijpers P, van de Ven P, et al. Personality and perceived need for mental health care among primary care patients. J Affect Disord. 2012;136:666–674. - PubMed

Publication types