Bioterrorism and biological threats dominate federal health security research; other priorities get scant attention
- PMID: 23213160
- DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0311
Bioterrorism and biological threats dominate federal health security research; other priorities get scant attention
Abstract
The federal government plays a critical role in achieving national health security by providing strategic guidance and funding research to help prevent, respond to, mitigate, and recover from disasters, epidemics, and acts of terrorism. In this article we describe the first-ever inventory of nonclassified national health security-related research funded by civilian agencies of the federal government. Our analysis revealed that the US government's portfolio of health security research is currently weighted toward bioterrorism and emerging biological threats, laboratory methods, and development of biological countermeasures. Eight of ten other priorities identified in the Department of Health and Human Services' National Health Security Strategy-such as developing and maintaining a national health security workforce or incorporating recovery into planning and response-receive scant attention. We offer recommendations to better align federal spending with health security research priorities, including the creation of an interagency working group charged with minimizing research redundancy and filling persistent gaps in knowledge.
Similar articles
-
Update on federal activities related to hospital funding for disaster preparedness.J Trauma Nurs. 2004 Apr-Jun;11(2):79-83. J Trauma Nurs. 2004. PMID: 16512279 Review. No abstract available.
-
Billions for biodefense: federal agency biodefense funding, FY2001-FY2005.Biosecur Bioterror. 2004;2(2):86-96. doi: 10.1089/153871304323146388. Biosecur Bioterror. 2004. PMID: 15225402 Review.
-
Project BioShield: what it is, why it is needed, and its accomplishments so far.Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Jul 15;45 Suppl 1:S68-72. doi: 10.1086/518151. Clin Infect Dis. 2007. PMID: 17582574
-
Throwing money at biodefense.Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Apr;22(4):375-8. doi: 10.1038/nbt0404-375. Nat Biotechnol. 2004. PMID: 15060542 No abstract available.
-
Funding agendas: has bioterror defense been over-prioritized?Am J Bioeth. 2005 Fall;5(4):34-44. doi: 10.1080/15265160590953076. Am J Bioeth. 2005. PMID: 16109694
Cited by
-
Ebola Virus: Sensationalism, Science, and Human Rights.J Infect Dis. 2015 Oct 1;212 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S79-83. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv359. Epub 2015 Jul 22. J Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 26203057 Free PMC article.
-
Continued vigilance - development of an online evaluation tool for assessing preparedness of medical facilities for biological events.Front Public Health. 2014 Apr 14;2:35. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00035. eCollection 2014. Front Public Health. 2014. PMID: 24783192 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review of strategies to manage and allocate scarce resources during mass casualty events.Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;61(6):677-689.e101. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Mar 20. Ann Emerg Med. 2013. PMID: 23522610 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
