Selection of pigs for improved coping with health and environmental challenges: breeding for resistance or tolerance?
- PMID: 23248641
- PMCID: PMC3522143
- DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00281
Selection of pigs for improved coping with health and environmental challenges: breeding for resistance or tolerance?
Abstract
The benefits of improved health and welfare in pigs have driven refinements in management and selection practices, one of which is the production of pig phenotypes that can maintain health and productivity by improving response against pathogens. Selection has traditionally been made for host resistance; but the alternative host defence mechanism-host tolerance-is now being considered, as breeding for disease tolerance allows maintenance of high performance across environments of increasing pathogenic load. A distinction must be made between these two mechanisms as they vary in their influence on host-pathogen interactions and pathogen evolution, and consequently on the results of breeding programs. Many pig production studies have failed to distinguish between resistance and tolerance; although a distinction may not always be possible. This article reviews current perspectives in selective breeding for disease resistance and tolerance in growing pigs, and the attendant industry implications. To assess the viability of breeding for resistance and/or tolerance for improved response to disease and other environmental challenges, we propose the use of routine farm records, instead of data measurements taken from laboratory experiments. Consequently, a number of factors need to be taken into account simultaneously for a multidimensional modeling approach. This includes not only genotype and disease variables, but also descriptors of the environment, as well as any possible interactions. It may not be feasible to record individual pathogen loads, and therefore true tolerance, on farm using routinely collected data. However, it may be estimated with group (farm) means, or other proxy measures. Although this results in a bias, this may still be useful for modeling and quantifying resistance and tolerance. We can then quantify success of selection, and this may enable us to decide whether to select for disease resistance versus disease tolerance.
Keywords: host defence strategies; pig breeding; reaction norm; resistance; tolerance.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Estimation of genetic parameters and breeding values across challenged environments to select for robust pigs.J Anim Sci. 2015 Apr;93(4):1494-502. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8583. J Anim Sci. 2015. PMID: 26020171
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Invited review: Phenotyping strategies and quantitative-genetic background of resistance, tolerance and resilience associated traits in dairy cattle.Animal. 2019 May;13(5):897-908. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118003208. Epub 2018 Dec 7. Animal. 2019. PMID: 30523776 Review.
-
Quantifying the health challenges in an Australian piggery using medication records for the definition of disease resilience1.J Anim Sci. 2019 Mar 1;97(3):1076-1089. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz025. J Anim Sci. 2019. PMID: 30715349 Free PMC article.
-
Why breed disease-resilient livestock, and how?Genet Sel Evol. 2020 Oct 14;52(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-00580-4. Genet Sel Evol. 2020. PMID: 33054713 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A promising resilience parameter for breeding: the use of weight and feed trajectories in growing pigs.J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2023 Aug 1;14(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s40104-023-00901-9. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2023. PMID: 37525252 Free PMC article.
-
Metabolite and Proteomic Profiling of Serum Reveals the Differences in Molecular Immunity between Min and Large White Pig Breeds.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 21;24(6):5924. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065924. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 36982998 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of a Multi-Suckling System Combined With Enriched Housing Post-Weaning on Response and Cognitive Resilience to Isolation.Front Vet Sci. 2022 Apr 11;9:868149. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.868149. eCollection 2022. Front Vet Sci. 2022. PMID: 35478601 Free PMC article.
-
A multi-suckling system combined with an enriched housing environment during the growing period promotes resilience to various challenges in pigs.Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 26;12(1):6804. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10745-4. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35474326 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative analysis of the blood transcriptome of young healthy pigs and its relationship with subsequent disease resilience.BMC Genomics. 2021 Aug 12;22(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07912-8. BMC Genomics. 2021. PMID: 34384354 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abdi H. (2010). Partial least squares regression and projection on latent structure regression (PLS regression). Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2, 97–106
-
- Adamo S. A. (2004). How should behavioural ecologists interpret measurements of immunity? Anim. Behav. 68, 1443–1449
-
- Albers G. A. A., Gray G. D., Piper L. R., Barker J. S. F., Le Jambre L. F., Barger I. A. (1987). The genetics of resistance and resilience to Haemonchus contortus infection in young merino sheep. Int. J. Parasitol. 17, 1355–1363 - PubMed
-
- Atkins K. D., Mortimer S. I. (1989). Project K/1/1065 Genetic Improvement of Reproductive Rate in Merino Sheep. Final Report to the Australian Wool Corporation. Trangie: New South Wales Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Centre
-
- Baucom R. S., de Roode J. C. (2011). Ecological immunology and tolerance in plants and animals. Funct. Ecol. 25, 18–28
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
