Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec 14:3:281.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00281. eCollection 2012.

Selection of pigs for improved coping with health and environmental challenges: breeding for resistance or tolerance?

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Selection of pigs for improved coping with health and environmental challenges: breeding for resistance or tolerance?

Sarita Z Y Guy et al. Front Genet. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

The benefits of improved health and welfare in pigs have driven refinements in management and selection practices, one of which is the production of pig phenotypes that can maintain health and productivity by improving response against pathogens. Selection has traditionally been made for host resistance; but the alternative host defence mechanism-host tolerance-is now being considered, as breeding for disease tolerance allows maintenance of high performance across environments of increasing pathogenic load. A distinction must be made between these two mechanisms as they vary in their influence on host-pathogen interactions and pathogen evolution, and consequently on the results of breeding programs. Many pig production studies have failed to distinguish between resistance and tolerance; although a distinction may not always be possible. This article reviews current perspectives in selective breeding for disease resistance and tolerance in growing pigs, and the attendant industry implications. To assess the viability of breeding for resistance and/or tolerance for improved response to disease and other environmental challenges, we propose the use of routine farm records, instead of data measurements taken from laboratory experiments. Consequently, a number of factors need to be taken into account simultaneously for a multidimensional modeling approach. This includes not only genotype and disease variables, but also descriptors of the environment, as well as any possible interactions. It may not be feasible to record individual pathogen loads, and therefore true tolerance, on farm using routinely collected data. However, it may be estimated with group (farm) means, or other proxy measures. Although this results in a bias, this may still be useful for modeling and quantifying resistance and tolerance. We can then quantify success of selection, and this may enable us to decide whether to select for disease resistance versus disease tolerance.

Keywords: host defence strategies; pig breeding; reaction norm; resistance; tolerance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The common portrayal of phenotypic responses of genotypes with a single predictor variable of pathogen burden. The three genotypes represented here are tolerant and not resistant (G1), resistant and not tolerant (G2), and resistant and tolerant (G3).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdi H. (2010). Partial least squares regression and projection on latent structure regression (PLS regression). Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2, 97–106
    1. Adamo S. A. (2004). How should behavioural ecologists interpret measurements of immunity? Anim. Behav. 68, 1443–1449
    1. Albers G. A. A., Gray G. D., Piper L. R., Barker J. S. F., Le Jambre L. F., Barger I. A. (1987). The genetics of resistance and resilience to Haemonchus contortus infection in young merino sheep. Int. J. Parasitol. 17, 1355–1363 - PubMed
    1. Atkins K. D., Mortimer S. I. (1989). Project K/1/1065 Genetic Improvement of Reproductive Rate in Merino Sheep. Final Report to the Australian Wool Corporation. Trangie: New South Wales Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Centre
    1. Baucom R. S., de Roode J. C. (2011). Ecological immunology and tolerance in plants and animals. Funct. Ecol. 25, 18–28

LinkOut - more resources