Impact of surgeon demographics and technique on outcomes after esophageal resections: a nationwide study
- PMID: 23261119
- DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.10.038
Impact of surgeon demographics and technique on outcomes after esophageal resections: a nationwide study
Abstract
Background: Thoracic, cardiac, and general surgeons perform esophageal resections in the United States. This article examines the impact of surgeon subspecialty on outcomes after esophagectomy.
Methods: Esophagectomies performed between 1998 and 2008 were identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Surgeons were classified as thoracic, cardiac, or general surgeons if greater than 65% of their operative case mix was representative of their specialty. Surgeons with less than 65% of a specialty-specific case mix served as controls. Regression equations calculated the independent effect of surgeon specialty, surgeon volume, and operative approach (transhiatal versus transthoracic) on outcomes.
Results: Of the 40,589 patients who underwent esophagectomies, surgeon identifiers were available for 23,529 patients. Based on case mix, thoracic, cardiac, and general surgeons performed 3,027 (12.9%), 688 (2.9%), and 4,086 (17.4%) esophagectomies, respectively. Operative technique did not independently affect risk-adjusted outcomes-mortality, morbidity, and failure to rescue (defined as death after a complication). Surgeon volume independently lowered mortality and failure to rescue by 4% (p ≤ 0.002 for both), but not complications (p = 0.6). High-volume hospitals (>12 procedures/year) independently lowered mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.96), and failure to rescue (AOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.94). Esophageal resections performed by general surgeons were associated with higher mortality (AOR, 1.87; 95% CI 1.02-3.45) and failure to rescue (AOR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.06-3.61) but not complications (AOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.64-1.49).
Conclusions: General surgeons perform the major proportion of esophagectomies in the United States. Surgeon subspecialty is not associated with the risk of complications developing but instead is associated with mortality and failure to rescue from complications. Surgeon subspecialty case mix is an important determinant of outcomes for patients undergoing esophagectomy.
Copyright © 2013 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The influence of surgeon specialty on outcomes in general thoracic surgery: a national sample 1996 to 2005.Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Nov;88(5):1566-72; discussion 1572-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.08.055. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19853114
-
Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation.Arch Surg. 2012 Nov;147(11):1009-16. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamasurg.96. Arch Surg. 2012. PMID: 23165615
-
Outcomes from 3144 adrenalectomies in the United States: which matters more, surgeon volume or specialty?Arch Surg. 2009 Nov;144(11):1060-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.191. Arch Surg. 2009. PMID: 19917944
-
The relationship between volume or surgeon specialty and outcome in the surgical treatment of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Jul;7(7):1170-8. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318257cc45. J Thorac Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22617248 Review.
-
The volume-outcome relation in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer. 2012 Apr 1;118(7):1754-63. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26383. Epub 2011 Aug 25. Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22009562 Review.
Cited by
-
Hospital teaching status is an independent predictor of surgical intervention of distal radius fractures.J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Jun 25;54:102476. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102476. eCollection 2024 Jul. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024. PMID: 39055127
-
Comparison of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy versus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study.J Inflamm Res. 2023 Aug 8;16:3351-3363. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S424454. eCollection 2023. J Inflamm Res. 2023. PMID: 37576156 Free PMC article.
-
Esophagectomies for Malignancy Among General and Thoracic Surgeons: A Propensity Score Matched National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis Stratified by Surgical Approach.Am Surg. 2023 Nov;89(11):4891-4894. doi: 10.1177/00031348211038573. Epub 2021 Aug 12. Am Surg. 2023. PMID: 34382445 Free PMC article.
-
Quality Versus Costs Related to Gastrointestinal Surgery: Disentangling the Value Proposition.J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Dec;24(12):2874-2883. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04748-7. Epub 2020 Jul 23. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020. PMID: 32705613 Review.
-
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A North American Perspective.J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jun;23(6):1087-1094. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-04093-w. Epub 2019 Jan 31. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019. PMID: 30847697
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
