Primary care practitioners' views on test result management in EHR-enabled health systems: a national survey
- PMID: 23268489
- PMCID: PMC3721157
- DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001267
Primary care practitioners' views on test result management in EHR-enabled health systems: a national survey
Abstract
Context: Failure to notify patients of test results is common even when electronic health records (EHRs) are used to report results to practitioners. We sought to understand the broad range of social and technical factors that affect test result management in an integrated EHR-based health system.
Methods: Between June and November 2010, we conducted a cross-sectional, web-based survey of all primary care practitioners (PCPs) within the Department of Veterans Affairs nationwide. Survey development was guided by a socio-technical model describing multiple inter-related dimensions of EHR use.
Findings: Of 5001 PCPs invited, 2590 (51.8%) responded. 55.5% believed that the EHRs did not have convenient features for notifying patients of test results. Over a third (37.9%) reported having staff support needed for notifying patients of test results. Many relied on the patient's next visit to notify them for normal (46.1%) and abnormal results (20.1%). Only 45.7% reported receiving adequate training on using the EHR notification system and 35.1% reported having an assigned contact for technical assistance with the EHR; most received help from colleagues (60.4%). A majority (85.6%) stayed after hours or came in on weekends to address notifications; less than a third reported receiving protected time (30.1%). PCPs strongly endorsed several new features to improve test result management, including better tracking and visualization of result notifications.
Conclusions: Despite an advanced EHR, both social and technical challenges exist in ensuring notification of test results to practitioners and patients. Current EHR technology requires significant improvement in order to avoid similar challenges elsewhere.
Keywords: diagnostic errors; electronic health records; health information technology; lack of follow-up; medical errors; missed test results.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Workarounds and Test Results Follow-up in Electronic Health Record-Based Primary Care.Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Jun 22;7(2):543-59. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-10-RA-0135. eCollection 2016. Appl Clin Inform. 2016. PMID: 27437060 Free PMC article.
-
Practicing Clinicians' Recommendations to Reduce Burden from the Electronic Health Record Inbox: a Mixed-Methods Study.J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1825-1832. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05112-5. Epub 2019 Jul 10. J Gen Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31292905 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding the management of electronic test result notifications in the outpatient setting.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Apr 12;11:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-22. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011. PMID: 21486478 Free PMC article.
-
Electronic Health Records' Support for Primary Care Physicians' Situation Awareness: A Metanarrative Review.Hum Factors. 2023 Mar;65(2):237-259. doi: 10.1177/00187208211014300. Epub 2021 May 25. Hum Factors. 2023. PMID: 34033500 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Electronic health records implementation: an evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors.Int J Med Inform. 2014 Nov;83(11):779-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jul 22. Int J Med Inform. 2014. PMID: 25085286 Review.
Cited by
-
Using an electronic safety netting tool designed to improve safety with respect to cancer referral in primary care: a qualitative service evaluation using rapid appraisal methods.BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jul;12(3):e002354. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002354. BMJ Open Qual. 2023. PMID: 37491106 Free PMC article.
-
Preventing lost-to-follow up diagnostic imaging in ambulatory care: evaluation of an electronic notification tool.BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jul;12(3):e002334. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002334. BMJ Open Qual. 2023. PMID: 37463784 Free PMC article.
-
Electronic safety-netting tool features considered important by UK general practice staff: an interview and Delphi consensus study.BJGP Open. 2023 Sep 19;7(3):BJGPO.2022.0163. doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0163. Print 2023 Sep. BJGP Open. 2023. PMID: 37277171 Free PMC article.
-
Physicians' Perspectives on a Multi-Dimensional Model for the Roles of Electronic Health Records in Approaching a Proper Differential Diagnosis.J Pers Med. 2023 Apr 19;13(4):680. doi: 10.3390/jpm13040680. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 37109066 Free PMC article.
-
Electronic Co-design (ECO-design) Workshop for Increasing Clinician Participation in the Design of Health Services Interventions: Participatory Design Approach.JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep 22;9(3):e37313. doi: 10.2196/37313. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022. PMID: 36136374 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Schiff GD, Hasan O, Kim S, et al. Diagnostic error in medicine: analysis of 583 physician-reported errors. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1881–7 - PubMed
-
- Lorincz CY, Drazen E, Sokol PE, et al. Research in Ambulatory Patient Safety 2000–2010: a 10-year review. Am Med Assoc 2011. Available at: www.ama-assn.org/go/patientsafety. (accessed 3 Dec 2012)
-
- Wynia MK, Classen DC. Improving ambulatory patient safety. JAMA 2011;306:22 2504–5 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
