Physicians' beliefs about breast cancer surveillance testing are consistent with test overuse
- PMID: 23269111
- PMCID: PMC3596481
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827da908
Physicians' beliefs about breast cancer surveillance testing are consistent with test overuse
Abstract
Background: Overuse of surveillance testing for breast cancer survivors is an important problem but its extent and determinants are incompletely understood. The objectives of this study were to determine the extent to which physicians' breast cancer surveillance testing beliefs are consistent with test overuse, and to identify factors associated with these beliefs.
Methods: During 2009-2010, a cross-sectional survey of US medical oncologists and primary care physicians (PCPs) was carried out. Physicians responded to a clinical vignette ascertaining beliefs about appropriate breast cancer surveillance testing. Multivariable analyses examined the extent to which test beliefs were consistent with overuse and associated with physician and practice characteristics and physician perceptions, attitudes, and practices.
Results: A total of 1098 medical oncologists and 980 PCPs completed the survey (response rate 57.5%). Eighty-four percent of PCPs [95% confidence interval (CI), 81.4%-86.5%] and 72% of oncologists (95% CI, 69.8%-74.7%) reported beliefs consistent with blood test overuse, whereas 50% of PCPs (95% CI, 47.3%-53.8%) and 27% of oncologists (95% CI, 23.9%-29.3%) reported beliefs consistent with imaging test overuse. Among PCPs, factors associated with these beliefs included smaller practice size, lower patient volume, and practice ownership. Among oncologists, factors included older age, international medical graduate status, lower self-efficacy (confidence in knowledge), and greater perceptions of ambiguity (conflicting expert recommendations) regarding survivorship care.
Conclusions: Beliefs consistent with breast cancer surveillance test overuse are common, greater for PCPs and blood tests than for oncologists and imaging tests, and associated with practice characteristics and perceived self-efficacy and ambiguity about testing. These results suggest modifiable targets for efforts to reduce surveillance test overuse.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Barriers to breast and colorectal cancer survivorship care: perceptions of primary care physicians and medical oncologists in the United States.J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jun 20;31(18):2322-36. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.6954. Epub 2013 May 20. J Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23690429 Free PMC article.
-
Differences between primary care physicians' and oncologists' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding the care of cancer survivors.J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Dec;26(12):1403-10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1808-4. Epub 2011 Jul 22. J Gen Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21785923 Free PMC article.
-
Physician preferences and attitudes regarding different models of cancer survivorship care: a comparison of primary care providers and oncologists.J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Sep;7(3):343-54. doi: 10.1007/s11764-013-0281-y. Epub 2013 Mar 24. J Cancer Surviv. 2013. PMID: 23526165
-
Primary care providers' cancer genetic testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and communication behaviors: A systematic review and research agenda.J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Mar;32(3):315-324. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3943-4. Epub 2016 Dec 19. J Gen Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 27995427 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multicancer Early Detection Tests: An Overview of Early Results From Prospective Clinical Studies and Opportunities for Oncologists.JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Dec;19(12):1111-1115. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00260. Epub 2023 Oct 18. JCO Oncol Pract. 2023. PMID: 37851937 Review.
Cited by
-
Adapting and implementing breast cancer follow-up in primary care: protocol for a mixed methods hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized study.BMC Prim Care. 2023 Nov 9;24(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02186-3. BMC Prim Care. 2023. PMID: 37946132 Free PMC article.
-
Low-Value Care: Convergence and Challenges Comment on "Key Factors That Promote Low-Value Care: Views From Experts From the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands".Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2762-2764. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7017. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022. PMID: 36404499 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating potential overuse of surveillance care in cancer survivors.Cancer Med. 2023 Mar;12(5):6139-6147. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5346. Epub 2022 Nov 11. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 36369671 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Determinants for the use and de-implementation of low-value care in health care: a scoping review.Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Feb 4;2(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00110-3. Implement Sci Commun. 2021. PMID: 33541443 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Why clinicians overtest: development of a thematic framework.BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 4;20(1):1011. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05844-9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 33148242 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Khatcheressian JL, Wolff AC, Smith TJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Nov 1;24(31):5091–5097. - PubMed
-
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.™ Breast Cancer Guidelines, Version 2.20082008
-
- Keating NL, Landrum MB, Guadagnoli E, Winer EP, Ayanian JZ. Surveillance testing among survivors of early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Mar 20;25(9):1074–1081. - PubMed
-
- Richert-Boe KE. Heterogeneity of cancer surveillance practices among medical oncologists in Washington and Oregon. Cancer. 1995 May 15;75(10):2605–2612. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
