Patients do not recall important details about polyps, required for colorectal cancer prevention
- PMID: 23270865
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.12.010
Patients do not recall important details about polyps, required for colorectal cancer prevention
Abstract
Background & aims: Guidelines recommend that the age of initiation and frequency of colorectal cancer screening or surveillance be based on patients' personal and family histories of colorectal neoplasia. However, it is not clear whether patients accurately recall results from their colonoscopy examinations or features of specific polyps.
Methods: Between 2008 and 2011, a 35-question survey was given to outpatients at the Digestive Disease Institute at the Cleveland Clinic who had previously undergone colonoscopy there. We collected responses from 233 participants (mean age, 59 y; 49% male); they provided demographic information, along with responses to questions on past colonoscopies, personal and family history of colorectal neoplasia, detection of polyps by colonoscopy, and number and other key features of polyps detected. Patient responses were compared with medical records.
Results: Of the patients surveyed, 82% correctly recalled the presence or absence of polyp(s). Of the 118 who correctly reported having polyps, 61% correctly recalled the number, 26% recalled the size, and 6%-33% recalled features of polyp pathology. Only 8% of individuals correctly recalled all 3 key features of polyps (size, number, and pathology). The patients' age when they underwent colonoscopy, current age, sex, education, or method by which they received their colonoscopy results did not significantly affect the accuracy with which they recalled the presence or key features of polyps.
Conclusions: Eighty-two percent of patients examined by colonoscopy correctly recalled whether or not they had polyp(s). However, most patients did not recall key details about their polyps (number, size, or pathology features) required to establish appropriate screening and surveillance intervals. New tools are needed to ensure that patients understand the importance of their colonoscopy findings and improve their recall accuracy.
Copyright © 2013 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Patients don't know their polyps, but do they know when to repeat colonoscopy?Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Nov;11(11):1522. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Jun 28. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013. PMID: 23811244 No abstract available.
-
Reply: To PMID 23270865.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Nov;11(11):1522-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.07.023. Epub 2013 Aug 3. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013. PMID: 23920030 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Endoscopic mis-sizing of polyps changes colorectal cancer surveillance recommendations.Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Mar;56(3):315-21. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31826dd138. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013. PMID: 23392145
-
Accuracy of Self-reported Colonic Polyps: Results from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Screening Trial Study of Colonoscopy Utilization.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 May;29(5):982-989. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0951. Epub 2020 Feb 12. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020. PMID: 32051194
-
High compliance rates observed for follow up colonoscopy post polypectomy are achievable outside of clinical trials: efficacy of polypectomy is not reduced by low compliance for follow up.Colorectal Dis. 2004 May;6(3):158-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00585.x. Colorectal Dis. 2004. PMID: 15109378
-
Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.Gastroenterology. 2006 May;130(6):1872-85. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.012. Gastroenterology. 2006. PMID: 16697750 Review.
-
Management of small and diminutive colorectal polyps: a review of the literature.Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2011 Jun;57(2):167-76. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2011. PMID: 21587146 Review.
Cited by
-
Prospective randomized pilot study of a novel patient-centered pathology report for colorectal polyps.PEC Innov. 2023 Nov 28;3:100238. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100238. eCollection 2023 Dec 15. PEC Innov. 2023. PMID: 38076486 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Decisions Regarding Rescheduling Colonoscopies Postponed Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic.Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Dec;68(12):4339-4349. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-08119-5. Epub 2023 Oct 4. Dig Dis Sci. 2023. PMID: 37794293
-
Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer Tied to Advanced Colorectal Polyps: An Untapped Opportunity to Screen First-Degree Relatives and Decrease Cancer Burden.Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul;115(7):980-988. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000639. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32618646 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Colorectal cancer screening for patients with a family history of colorectal cancer or adenomas.Can Fam Physician. 2019 Nov;65(11):784-789. Can Fam Physician. 2019. PMID: 31722908 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge of Polyp History and Recommended Follow-Up Among a Predominately African American Patient Population and the Impact of Patient Navigation.J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016 Sep;3(3):403-12. doi: 10.1007/s40615-015-0152-5. Epub 2015 Sep 3. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016. PMID: 27294735
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
