Presenting treatment options to men with clinically localized prostate cancer: the acceptability of active surveillance/monitoring
- PMID: 23271772
- PMCID: PMC3540874
- DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs030
Presenting treatment options to men with clinically localized prostate cancer: the acceptability of active surveillance/monitoring
Abstract
Presenting treatment options to men with localized prostate cancer is difficult because of the lack of definitive evidence and the range of treatment options available. Active surveillance and monitoring programs are now a recognized treatment option for men with low-risk localized prostate cancer, but many patients are not fully aware of the details of such programs, and most still opt for immediate radical (surgery or radiotherapy) treatment. The provision of high-quality information with decision aids has been shown to increase the acceptability of active surveillance/monitoring programs. This chapter outlines techniques for providing high-quality information about active surveillance/monitoring, based on the findings of a randomized controlled trial of treatments for localized prostate cancer. The ProtecT (Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment) trial has randomized over 1500 men between active monitoring, radical surgery, and radical radiotherapy by ensuring that information was tailored to men's existing knowledge and views. Care was taken with the content, order, and enthusiasm of the presentation of treatments by recruitment staff, and clinicians and other health professionals were supported to feel comfortable with being open about the uncertainties in the evidence and helped to rephrase terminology likely to be misinterpreted by patients. These techniques of information provision should be added to the use of decision aids to enable patients diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer in routine practice to reach well-informed and reasoned decisions about their treatment, including full consideration of active surveillance and monitoring programs.
Similar articles
-
Improving the communication of benefits and harms of treatment strategies: decision AIDS for localized prostate cancer treatment decisions.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012 Dec;2012(45):197-201. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs023. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012. PMID: 23271773 Free PMC article.
-
An evidence review of active surveillance in men with localized prostate cancer.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011 Dec;(204):1-341. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011. PMID: 23126653 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial: VA/NCI/AHRQ Cooperative Studies Program #407 (PIVOT): design and baseline results of a randomized controlled trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting for men with clinically localized prostate cancer.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012 Dec;2012(45):184-90. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs041. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012. PMID: 23271771 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Active surveillance compared with initial treatment for men with low-risk prostate cancer: a decision analysis.JAMA. 2010 Dec 1;304(21):2373-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1720. JAMA. 2010. PMID: 21119084 Free PMC article.
-
Clarifying uncertainty regarding detection and treatment of early-stage prostate cancer.Semin Urol Oncol. 2002 Feb;20(1):10-7. doi: 10.1053/suro.2002.30393. Semin Urol Oncol. 2002. PMID: 11828353 Review.
Cited by
-
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 29;1(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38284415 Review.
-
A Comprehensive Review of Breast Fibroadenoma: Correlating Clinical and Pathological Findings.Cureus. 2023 Dec 5;15(12):e49948. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49948. eCollection 2023 Dec. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38179396 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quality of Life and Psychological Distress among Patients with Small Renal Masses.J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 7;11(14):3944. doi: 10.3390/jcm11143944. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35887708 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cross-cultural differences in men on active surveillance' anxiety: a longitudinal comparison between Italian and Dutch patients from the Prostate cancer Research International Active Surveillance study.BMC Urol. 2022 Jul 18;22(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01062-z. BMC Urol. 2022. PMID: 35850672 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Perceived barriers to the adoption of active surveillance in low-risk prostate cancer: a qualitative analysis of community and academic urologists.BMC Cancer. 2021 May 31;21(1):649. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08386-3. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34058998 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fowler FJ, Jr, McNaughton Collins M, Albertsen PC, Zietman A, Elliott DB, Barry MJ. Comparison of recommendations by urologists and radiation oncologists for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.. JAMA. 2000;283(24):3217–3222 - PubMed
-
- Hanna CL, Mason MD, Donovan JL, Barber JP. Clinical oncologists favour radical radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a questionnaire survey.. BJU Int. 2002;90(6):558–560 - PubMed
-
- Etzioni R, Penson DF, Legler JM, et al. Overdiagnosis due to prostate-specific antigen screening: lessons from U.S. prostate cancer incidence trends.. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(13):981–990 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
