Objective quantification of aortic valvular structures by cardiac computed tomography angiography in patients considered for transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jan 1;81(1):148-59. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23486.

Abstract

Purpose: To test the ability of a model-based segmentation of the aortic root for consistent assessment of aortic valve structures in patients considered for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) who underwent 256-slice cardiac computed tomography (CT).

Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 49) with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis considered for TAVI and patients without aortic stenosis (n = 17) underwent cardiac CT. Images were evaluated by two independent observers who measured the diameter of the aortic annulus and its distance to both coronary ostia (1) manually and (2) software-assisted. All acquired measures were compared with each other and to (3) fully automatic quantification.

Results: High correlations were observed for 3D measures of the aortic annulus conducted on multiple oblique planes (r = 0.87 and 0.84 between observers and model-based measures, and r = 0.81 between observers). Reproducibility was further improved by software-assisted versus manual assessment for all the acquired variables (r = 0.98 versus 0.81 for annulus diameter, r = 0.94 versus 0.85 for distance to the left coronary ostium, P < 0.01 for both). Thus, using software-assisted measurements very low limits of agreement were observed for the annulus diameter (95%CI of -1.2 to 0.6 mm) and within very low time-spent (0.6 ± 0.1 min for software-assisted versus 1.6 ± 0.3 min per patient for manual assessment, P < 0.001). Assessment of the aortic annulus using the 3D model-based instead of manual 2D-coronal measurements would have modified the implantation strategy in 12 of 49 patients (25%) with aortic stenosis. Four of 12 patients with potentially modified implantation strategy yielded postprocedural moderate paravalvular regurgitation, which may have been avoided by implantation of a larger prosthesis, as suggested by automatic 3D measures.

Conclusion: Our study highlights the usefulness of software-assisted preprocedural assessment of the aortic annulus in patients considered for TAVI.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Angiography / methods*
  • Aortic Valve / diagnostic imaging
  • Aortic Valve / physiopathology
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis
  • Cardiac Catheterization / methods*
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Female
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / methods*
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Selection
  • Prospective Studies
  • Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Risk Assessment
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*
  • Treatment Outcome