Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Dec;18(12):821-9.

Population-based breast cancer screening in a primary care network

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Population-based breast cancer screening in a primary care network

Steven J Atlas et al. Am J Manag Care. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the ability of a health information technology system to facilitate population- based breast cancer screening.

Study design: Cohort study with 2-year follow-up after a 1-year cluster randomized trial.

Methods: Study population was women 42 to 69 years old receiving care within a 12-practice primary care network. The management informatics system (1) identified women overdue for mammograms, (2) connected them to primary care providers using a web-based tool, (3) created automatically generated outreach letters for patients specified by providers, (4) monitored for subsequent mammography scheduling and completion, and (5) provided practice delegates with a list of women remaining unscreened for reminder phone calls. Eligible women overdue for a mammogram during a 1-year study period included those overdue at study start (prevalent cohort) and those who became overdue during follow-up (incident cohort). The main outcome measure was mammography completion rates over 3 years.

Results: Among 32,688 eligible women, 9795 (30%) were overdue for screening (4487 intervention, 5308 control). Intervention patients were somewhat younger, more likely to be non-Hispanic white, and more likely to have health insurance compared with control patients. Adjusted completion rates in the prevalent cohort (n = 6697) were significantly higher among intervention patients after 3 years (51.7% vs 45.8%; P = .002). For patients in the incident cohort (n = 3098), adjusted completion rates after 2 years were 53.8% versus 48.7%, respectively (P = .052).

Conclusions: Population-based informatics systems can enable sustained increases in mammography screening rates beyond rates seen with office-based visit reminders.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00462891.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram depicting the flow of study practice clusters and patients through randomization, intervention, and outcome analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percent completing mammography during 3-years of follow-up in intervention and control practices among, A. women overdue at the start of follow-up (prevalent cohort) and B. women becoming overdue during the first year of follow-up (incident cohort). Figure 2A: Percent of women overdue for mammography at the start of follow-up (prevalent cohort) in intervention and control groups who completed screening in each year of follow-up. Figure 2B: Percent of women becoming overdue for mammography during the first year of follow-up (incident cohort) in intervention and control groups who completed screening in each year of follow-up.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier curves of time to mammography completion during 3 years of follow-up among, A. women overdue at the start of follow-up (prevalent overdue) and B. women becoming overdue during the first year of follow-up (incident overdue) in intervention and control practices. Shaded area around each line represents the 95% confidence interval for that Kaplan-Meier curve.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jain SH, Seidman J, Blumenthal D. How health plans, health systems, and others in the private sector can stimulate ‘meaningful use’. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:1667–70. - PubMed
    1. Stark P. Congressional intent for the HITECH Act. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16:SP24–8. - PubMed
    1. Jones SS, Adams JL, Schneider EC, et al. Electronic health record adoption and quality improvement in US hospitals. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16:SP64–71. - PubMed
    1. Ornstein SM, Garr DR, Jenkins RG, et al. Computer-generated physician and patient reminders. Tools to improve population adherence to selected preventive services. J Fam Pract. 1991;32:82–90. - PubMed
    1. Poon EG, Wright A, Simon SR, et al. Relationship between use of electronic health record features and health care quality: results of a statewide survey. Med Care. 2010;48:203–9. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data