Personalized preventive care leads to significant reductions in hospital utilization
- PMID: 23286675
Personalized preventive care leads to significant reductions in hospital utilization
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the impact of the MDVIP model of personalized preventive care on hospital utilization rates over a 5-year period.
Study design: This study was a comparative hospital utilization analysis between MDVIP members and nonmembers using the Intellimed database from 5 mandatory reporting states (New York, Florida, Virginia, Arizona, and Nevada) from 2006 to 2010.
Methods: Hospital discharge rates per 1000 persons were calculated and comparisons were made between members and nonmembers by age (Medicare [>65 years] vs non-Medicare [35-64 years]) and year.
Results: Overall, MDVIP members were approximately 42%, 47%, 54%, 58%, and 62% less likely to be hospitalized relative to nonmembers for the years 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively. By 2010, MDVIP hospital discharges for the Medicare population were 79% lower than the nonmember Medicare population, and this difference was shown to be trending up since 2006 (70% to 79%). A similar trend was seen in the non- Medicare population (49% to 72%). In addition, elective, non-elective, emergent, urgent, avoidable, and unavoidable admissions were all lower in the MDVIP members compared with nonmembers for each year.
Conclusions: The MDVIP model of personalized preventive care allows the physician to take a more proactive, rather than reactive, approach; we believe this increased physician interaction is the reason for the lower hospital utilization and ultimately lower healthcare costs seen here.
Similar articles
-
The Impact of Personalized Preventive Care on Health Care Quality, Utilization, and Expenditures.Popul Health Manag. 2016 Dec;19(6):389-397. doi: 10.1089/pop.2015.0171. Epub 2016 Feb 12. Popul Health Manag. 2016. PMID: 26871762 Free PMC article.
-
Personalized preventive care reduces healthcare expenditures among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries.Am J Manag Care. 2014 Aug;20(8):613-20. Am J Manag Care. 2014. PMID: 25295675
-
Payer effects of personalized preventive care for patients with diabetes.Am J Manag Care. 2020 Mar 1;26(3):e70-e75. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42638. Am J Manag Care. 2020. PMID: 32181618
-
Preventive services for the elderly: would coverage affect utilization and costs under Medicare?Am J Public Health. 1995 Mar;85(3):387-91. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.3.387. Am J Public Health. 1995. PMID: 7892924 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Relationship between insurance and 30-day readmission rates in patients 65 years and older discharged from an acute care hospital with hospice services.J Hosp Med. 2016 Oct;11(10):688-693. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2613. Epub 2016 May 25. J Hosp Med. 2016. PMID: 27222206 Review.
Cited by
-
Childhood adversities and rate of adulthood all-cause hospitalization in the general population: A retrospective cohort study.PLoS One. 2023 Jun 12;18(6):e0287015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287015. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37307280 Free PMC article.
-
Potentially preventable hospitalizations and use of preventive services among people with multiple sclerosis: Large cohort study, USA.Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Dec;68:104105. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104105. Epub 2022 Aug 11. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022. PMID: 36031692 Free PMC article.
-
Direct primary care: Family physician perceptions of a growing model.Popul Med. 2021 Aug;3:21. doi: 10.18332/popmed/140087. Epub 2021 Aug 2. Popul Med. 2021. PMID: 34651142 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Personalized Preventive Care on Health Care Quality, Utilization, and Expenditures.Popul Health Manag. 2016 Dec;19(6):389-397. doi: 10.1089/pop.2015.0171. Epub 2016 Feb 12. Popul Health Manag. 2016. PMID: 26871762 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical