"Fault-line of an earthquake": a qualitative examination of barriers and facilitators to colorectal cancer screening in rural, Eastern North Carolina
- PMID: 23289658
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2012.00424.x
"Fault-line of an earthquake": a qualitative examination of barriers and facilitators to colorectal cancer screening in rural, Eastern North Carolina
Abstract
Purpose: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality and disparately affects rural, low-income and minority individuals. Thus, to inform effective interventions and policies to increase screening rates and thus ameliorate CRC disparities, this study's purpose was to examine barriers and facilitators to CRC screening among low-income, rural eastern North Carolina residents.
Methods: We conducted 4 focus group discussions in October and November 2011, among a convenience sample of eastern North Carolina residents (n = 45). The focus group discussion guide included open-ended questions about barriers and facilitators to CRC screening. Discussions were audio recorded and then transcribed verbatim. A codebook listing codes and operational definitions was developed by 2 research team members, who then iteratively and independently double-coded all transcripts. Nvivo (version 9, QSR International Pty Ltd, Doncaster, Victoria, Australia) was used to manage data. Themes were extracted based upon depth and frequency of mention.
Findings: Major barriers to CRC screening included the high cost of tests and follow-up care, fear of the test itself (colonoscopy), fear of cancer diagnosis, and fear of burdening family members. Violation (among men) and embarrassment (among women) were also barriers. Facilitators included doctor's recommendation, symptoms, support from family and friends, and the desire to live a long and healthy life. Intervention ideas included free tests with information and resources for follow-up care as needed.
Conclusion: Understanding barriers and facilitators to CRC screening can assist clinicians and public health practitioners in designing effective interventions to reduce CRC disparities.
© 2012 National Rural Health Association.
Similar articles
-
Why Wait Until Our Community Gets Cancer?: Exploring CRC Screening Barriers and Facilitators in the Spanish-Speaking Community in North Carolina.J Cancer Educ. 2016 Dec;31(4):652-659. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0890-4. J Cancer Educ. 2016. PMID: 26264390 Free PMC article.
-
Physician counseling for colorectal cancer screening: impact on patient attitudes, beliefs, and behavior.J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):673-81. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.06.110001. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011. PMID: 22086810 Clinical Trial.
-
Factors influencing colorectal cancer screening in rural southern Taiwan.Cancer Nurs. 2013 Jul-Aug;36(4):284-91. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e318263f46a. Cancer Nurs. 2013. PMID: 22964866
-
How to enhance physician and public acceptance and utilisation of colon cancer screening recommendations.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;24(4):509-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.002. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010. PMID: 20833353 Review.
-
Colorectal cancer screening participation: a systematic review.Eur J Public Health. 2016 Feb;26(1):158-68. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv148. Epub 2015 Sep 14. Eur J Public Health. 2016. PMID: 26370437 Review.
Cited by
-
Decision-making on colorectal cancer screening in Curaçao - interviews with the target population.BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 27;23(1):1437. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16335-x. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37501171 Free PMC article.
-
Increasing Access to Care for the Underserved: Voices of Riders, Drivers, & Staff of a Rural Transportation Program.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;19(20):13539. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013539. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36294124 Free PMC article.
-
Qualitative Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Nebraska.J Cancer Educ. 2023 Apr;38(2):652-663. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02170-y. Epub 2022 Apr 18. J Cancer Educ. 2023. PMID: 35437633 Free PMC article.
-
Gastrointestinal Cancer Prevention Policies: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.Int J Prev Med. 2022 Jan 19;13:8. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_419_20. eCollection 2022. Int J Prev Med. 2022. PMID: 35281982 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Design of a randomized controlled trial to assess the comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve three-year adherence to colorectal cancer screening among patients cared for in rural community health centers.Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Feb;113:106654. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106654. Epub 2021 Dec 11. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022. PMID: 34906745 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
