Comparison of enhanced targeted rapid HIV screening using the Denver HIV risk score to nontargeted rapid HIV screening in the emergency department
- PMID: 23290527
- PMCID: PMC4730951
- DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.10.031
Comparison of enhanced targeted rapid HIV screening using the Denver HIV risk score to nontargeted rapid HIV screening in the emergency department
Abstract
Study objective: A clinical prediction tool, the Denver HIV Risk Score, was recently developed to help identify patients with increased probability of undiagnosed HIV infection. Our goal was to compare targeted rapid HIV screening using the Denver HIV Risk Score to nontargeted rapid HIV screening in an urban emergency department (ED) and urgent care.
Methods: We used a prospective, before-after design at an urban medical center with an approximate annual census of 110,000 visits. Patients aged 13 years or older were eligible for screening. Targeted HIV screening of patients identified as high-risk by nurses using the Denver HIV Risk Score during medical screening was compared to nontargeted HIV screening offered by medical screening nurses during 2 separate 4-month time periods. The primary outcome was newly diagnosed HIV-infected patients.
Results: 28,506 patients presented during the targeted phase, 1,718 were identified as high-risk, and 551 completed HIV testing. Of these, 7 (1.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5% to 2.6%) were newly diagnosed with HIV infection. 29,510 patients presented during the nontargeted phase and 3,591 completed HIV testing. Of these, 7 (0.2%, 95% CI 0.1% to 0.4%) were newly diagnosed with HIV infection. Targeted HIV screening was significantly associated with identification of newly diagnosed HIV infection when compared to nontargeted screening, adjusting for patient demographics and payer status (relative risk [RR] 10.4, 95% CI 3.4 to 32.0).
Conclusion: Targeted HIV screening using the Denver HIV Risk Score was strongly associated with new HIV diagnoses when compared to nontargeted screening. Although both HIV screening methods identified the same absolute number of newly diagnosed patients, significantly fewer tests were required during the targeted phase to achieve the same effect.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Mosby, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
None of these individuals received compensation as part of this study and none have declared existing competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparison of HIV Screening Strategies in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2117763. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17763. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34309668 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Routine opt-out rapid HIV screening and detection of HIV infection in emergency department patients.JAMA. 2010 Jul 21;304(3):284-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.953. JAMA. 2010. PMID: 20639562
-
Programmatic cost evaluation of nontargeted opt-out rapid HIV screening in the emergency department.PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e81565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081565. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24391706 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Targeted HIV Screening in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.Curr HIV Res. 2021;19(2):106-120. doi: 10.2174/1570162X18666201123113905. Curr HIV Res. 2021. PMID: 33231157 Review.
-
Opt-out screening strategy for HIV infection among patients attending emergency departments: systematic review and meta-analysis.HIV Med. 2017 Jul;18(6):419-429. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12474. Epub 2016 Dec 21. HIV Med. 2017. PMID: 28000338 Review.
Cited by
-
Design and Proof of Concept of a Web-Based Questionnaire to Identify Patients at Risk for HIV and HCV Infection.Biomedicines. 2024 Aug 14;12(8):1846. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12081846. Biomedicines. 2024. PMID: 39200310 Free PMC article.
-
Testing trends and co-testing patterns for HIV, hepatitis C and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in Emergency departments.Prev Med Rep. 2024 Jun 8;44:102777. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102777. eCollection 2024 Aug. Prev Med Rep. 2024. PMID: 39099772 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Screening in Emergency Departments: Results From the Pragmatic Randomized HIV Testing Using Enhanced Screening Techniques in Emergency Departments Trial.Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;84(3):234-243. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.03.009. Epub 2024 Apr 24. Ann Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 38661620 Clinical Trial.
-
The Determining Effective Testing in Emergency Departments and Care Coordination on Treatment Outcomes (DETECT) for Hepatitis C (Hep C) Linkage-to-Care Trial: rationale and design of an emergency department-based randomized clinical trial of linkage-to-care strategies for hepatitis C.Trials. 2023 Jan 27;24(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07018-w. Trials. 2023. PMID: 36707909 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of HIV Screening Strategies in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2117763. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17763. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34309668 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV surveillance report. 2009 http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/surveillance/resources/reports/2009report/index.htm. Accessed September 27, 2011.
-
- Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, et al. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55:1–17. - PubMed
-
- White House Office of National AIDS Policy. National HIV/AIDS strategy for the United States. 2010 http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/NHAS.pdf. Accessed September 27, 2011.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. High-impact HIV prevention: CDC’s approach to reducing HIV infection in the United States. 2011 http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/nhas/dhap/pdf/nhas_booklet.pdf. Accessed September 27, 2011.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
