Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2013 Mar;51(3):266-74.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827da99c.

Improving the reliability of physician "report cards"

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Improving the reliability of physician "report cards"

Kimberly A Smith et al. Med Care. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Performance measures are widely used to profile primary care physicians (PCPs) but their reliability is often limited by small sample sizes. We evaluated the reliability of individual PCP profiles and whether they can be improved by combining measures into composites or by profiling practice groups.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of electronic health record data for patients with diabetes (DM), congestive heart failure (CHF), ischemic vascular disease (IVD), or eligible for preventive care services seen by a PCP within a large, integrated health care system between April 2009 and May 2010. We evaluated performance on 14 measures of DM care, 9 of CHF, 7 of IVD, and 4 of preventive care.

Results: There were 51,771 patients observed by 163 physicians in 17 clinics. Few PCPs (0%-60%) could be profiled with 80% reliability using single process or intermediate-outcome measures. Combining measures into single-disease composites improved reliability for DM and preventive care with 74.5% and 76.7% of PCPs having sufficient panel sizes, but composites remained unreliable for CHF and IVD. A total of 85.3% of PCPs could be reliably profiled using a single overall composite. Aggregating PCPs into practice groups (3 to 21 PCPs per group) did not improve reliability in most cases because of little between-group practice variation.

Conclusions: Single measures rarely differentiate between individual PCPs or groups of PCPs reliably. Combining measures into single-disease or multidisease composites can improve reliability for some common conditions, but not all. Assessing PCP practice groups within a single health care system, rather than individual PCPs, did not substantially improve reliability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. PCP Quality Scores
Reliability-adjusted primary care physician (PCP) quality scores with confidence intervals for single-disease and overall composite measures. Score reflects the expected PCP performance on an average difficulty measure for a 65 year-old female patient with one comorbidity.
Figure 1
Figure 1. PCP Quality Scores
Reliability-adjusted primary care physician (PCP) quality scores with confidence intervals for single-disease and overall composite measures. Score reflects the expected PCP performance on an average difficulty measure for a 65 year-old female patient with one comorbidity.
Figure 1
Figure 1. PCP Quality Scores
Reliability-adjusted primary care physician (PCP) quality scores with confidence intervals for single-disease and overall composite measures. Score reflects the expected PCP performance on an average difficulty measure for a 65 year-old female patient with one comorbidity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Christianson JB, Volmar KM, Alexander J, et al. A report card on provider report cards: current status of the health care transparency movement. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:1235–1241. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenthal MB, Landon BE, Normand SL, et al. Pay for performance in commercial HMOs. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1895–1902. - PubMed
    1. The Commonwealth Fund Commission on a High Performance Health System. Health System Performance. 2011. Why Not the Best? Results from the National Scorecard on U.S.
    1. Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, et al. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA. 2005;294:716–724. - PubMed
    1. Keating NL, Landrum MB, Landon BE, et al. The influence of physicians' practice management strategies and financial arrangements on quality of care among patients with diabetes. Med Care. 2004;42:829–839. - PubMed

Publication types