Improving the reliability of physician "report cards"
- PMID: 23295578
- PMCID: PMC3669898
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827da99c
Improving the reliability of physician "report cards"
Abstract
Background: Performance measures are widely used to profile primary care physicians (PCPs) but their reliability is often limited by small sample sizes. We evaluated the reliability of individual PCP profiles and whether they can be improved by combining measures into composites or by profiling practice groups.
Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of electronic health record data for patients with diabetes (DM), congestive heart failure (CHF), ischemic vascular disease (IVD), or eligible for preventive care services seen by a PCP within a large, integrated health care system between April 2009 and May 2010. We evaluated performance on 14 measures of DM care, 9 of CHF, 7 of IVD, and 4 of preventive care.
Results: There were 51,771 patients observed by 163 physicians in 17 clinics. Few PCPs (0%-60%) could be profiled with 80% reliability using single process or intermediate-outcome measures. Combining measures into single-disease composites improved reliability for DM and preventive care with 74.5% and 76.7% of PCPs having sufficient panel sizes, but composites remained unreliable for CHF and IVD. A total of 85.3% of PCPs could be reliably profiled using a single overall composite. Aggregating PCPs into practice groups (3 to 21 PCPs per group) did not improve reliability in most cases because of little between-group practice variation.
Conclusions: Single measures rarely differentiate between individual PCPs or groups of PCPs reliably. Combining measures into single-disease or multidisease composites can improve reliability for some common conditions, but not all. Assessing PCP practice groups within a single health care system, rather than individual PCPs, did not substantially improve reliability.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The unreliability of individual physician "report cards" for assessing the costs and quality of care of a chronic disease.JAMA. 1999 Jun 9;281(22):2098-105. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.22.2098. JAMA. 1999. PMID: 10367820
-
Whom should we profile? Examining diabetes care practice variation among primary care providers, provider groups, and health care facilities.Health Serv Res. 2002 Oct;37(5):1159-80. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.01102. Health Serv Res. 2002. PMID: 12479491 Free PMC article.
-
Benchmarking physician performance: reliability of individual and composite measures.Am J Manag Care. 2008 Dec;14(12):833-8. Am J Manag Care. 2008. PMID: 19067500 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability of Physician-Level Measures of Patient Experience in Primary Care.J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Dec;32(12):1323-1329. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4175-y. Epub 2017 Sep 12. J Gen Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28900821 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;(9):CD008451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008451.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. PMID: 21901722 Review.
Cited by
-
Physician Characteristics Associated With Ordering 4 Low-Value Screening Tests in Primary Care.JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Oct 5;1(6):e183506. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3506. JAMA Netw Open. 2018. PMID: 30646242 Free PMC article.
-
Should interventions to reduce variation in care quality target doctors or hospitals?Health Policy. 2018 Jun;122(6):660-666. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 13. Health Policy. 2018. PMID: 29703654 Free PMC article.
-
Diabetes care improvement in pharmacist- versus nurse-supported patient-centered medical homes.Am J Manag Care. 2017 Nov 1;23(11):e374-e381. Am J Manag Care. 2017. PMID: 29182358 Free PMC article.
-
Misclassification Risk of Tier-Based Physician Quality Performance Systems.Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug;52(4):1277-1296. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12561. Epub 2016 Oct 7. Health Serv Res. 2017. PMID: 27714791 Free PMC article.
-
Resident dashboards: helping your clinical competency committee visualize trainees' key performance indicators.Med Educ Online. 2016 Mar 31;21:29838. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.29838. eCollection 2016. Med Educ Online. 2016. PMID: 27037226 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rosenthal MB, Landon BE, Normand SL, et al. Pay for performance in commercial HMOs. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1895–1902. - PubMed
-
- The Commonwealth Fund Commission on a High Performance Health System. Health System Performance. 2011. Why Not the Best? Results from the National Scorecard on U.S.
-
- Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, et al. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA. 2005;294:716–724. - PubMed
-
- Keating NL, Landrum MB, Landon BE, et al. The influence of physicians' practice management strategies and financial arrangements on quality of care among patients with diabetes. Med Care. 2004;42:829–839. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
