Time lag to benefit after screening for breast and colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of survival data from the United States, Sweden, United Kingdom, and Denmark
- PMID: 23299842
- PMCID: PMC4688425
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e8441
Time lag to benefit after screening for breast and colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of survival data from the United States, Sweden, United Kingdom, and Denmark
Abstract
Objectives: To determine a pooled, quantitative estimate of the length of time needed after breast or colorectal cancer screening before a survival benefit is observed.
Design: Meta-analysis of survival data from population based, randomized controlled trials comparing populations screened and not screened for breast or colorectal cancer. Trials were identified as high quality by reviews from the Cochrane Collaboration and United States Preventive Services Task Force.
Setting: Trials undertaken in the United States, Denmark, United Kingdom, and Sweden.
Population: Screened patients older than 40 years.
Primary outcome measures: Time to death from breast or colorectal cancer in screened and control populations.
Interventions: Fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening, mammography for breast cancer screening.
Results: Our study included five and four eligible trials of breast and colorectal cancer screening, respectively. For breast cancer screening, 3.0 years (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 6.3) passed before one death from breast cancer was prevented for every 5000 women screened. On average across included studies, it took 10.7 years (4.4 to 21.6) before one death from breast cancer was prevented for 1000 women screened. For colorectal cancer screening, 4.8 years (2.0 to 9.7) passed before one death from colorectal cancer was prevented for 5000 patients screened. On average across included studies, it took 10.3 years (6.0 to 16.4) before one death from colorectal cancer was prevented for 1000 patients screened.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that screening for breast and colorectal cancer is most appropriate for patients with a life expectancy greater than 10 years. Incorporating time lag estimates into screening guidelines would encourage a more explicit consideration of the risks and benefits of screening for breast and colorectal cancer.
Figures
Comment in
-
Benefits of cancer screening take years to appreciate.BMJ. 2013 Jan 16;346:f299. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f299. BMJ. 2013. PMID: 23325877 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effect of Time to Diagnostic Testing for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Abnormalities on Screening Efficacy: A Modeling Study.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Feb;27(2):158-164. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0378. Epub 2017 Nov 17. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018. PMID: 29150480 Free PMC article.
-
Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2002 Sep 3;137(5 Part 1):347-60. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-5_part_1-200209030-00012. Ann Intern Med. 2002. PMID: 12204020
-
Colorectal cancer mortality: effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood.J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Mar 3;91(5):434-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.5.434. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999. PMID: 10070942
-
Review in depth and meta-analysis of controlled trials on colorectal cancer screening by faecal occult blood test.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Apr;18(4):427-33. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200604000-00018. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006. PMID: 16538116 Review.
-
Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):244-55. doi: 10.7326/M15-0969. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Ann Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 26756588 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of Messaging on Support for Breast Cancer Screening Cessation Among Older US Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2428700. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.28700. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39158912 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Breamy: An augmented reality mHealth prototype for surgical decision-making in breast cancer.Healthc Technol Lett. 2023 Dec 27;11(2-3):137-145. doi: 10.1049/htl2.12071. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun. Healthc Technol Lett. 2023. PMID: 38638506 Free PMC article.
-
The association between organised colorectal cancer screening strategies and reduction of its related mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Cancer. 2024 Mar 21;24(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12054-7. BMC Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38515013 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Evaluation of Messages for Reducing Overscreening of Breast Cancer in Older Women.Med Care. 2024 May 1;62(5):296-304. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001993. Epub 2024 Mar 12. Med Care. 2024. PMID: 38498875 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:627-37. - PubMed
-
- Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:716-26, W-236. - PubMed
-
- Whitlock EP, Lin J, Liles E, Beil T, Fu R, O’Connor E, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review. Evidence Synthesis no 65, part 1. AHRQ publication no 08-05124-EF-1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, October 2008:1-88. - PubMed
-
- US Preventive Services Task Force. Colon cancer screening (USPSTF recommendation). J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48:333-5. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical