Hindquarter amputation: is it still needed and what are the outcomes?

Bone Joint J. 2013 Jan;95-B(1):127-31. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B1.29131.

Abstract

A total of 157 hindquarter amputations were carried out in our institution during the last 30 years. We have investigated the reasons why this procedure is still required and the outcome. This operation was used as treatment for 13% of all pelvic bone sarcomas. It was curative in 140 and palliative in 17, usually to relieve pain. There were 90 primary procedures (57%) with the remaining 67 following the failure of previous operations to control the disease locally. The indication for amputation in primary disease was for large tumours for which limb-salvage surgery was no longer feasible. The peri-operative mortality was 1.3% (n = 2) and major complications of wound healing or infection arose in 71 (45%) patients. The survival at five years after hindquarter amputation with the intent to cure was 45%, and at ten years 38%. Local recurrence occurred in 23 patients (15%). Phantom pain was a significant problem, and only 20% used their prosthesis regularly. Functional scores were a mean of 57%. With careful patient selection the oncological results and functional outcomes of hindquarter amputation justify its continued use.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Bone Neoplasms / mortality
  • Bone Neoplasms / pathology
  • Bone Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Child
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hemipelvectomy* / mortality
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / mortality
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / surgery
  • Palliative Care / methods
  • Palliative Care / statistics & numerical data
  • Pelvic Bones* / pathology
  • Pelvic Bones* / surgery
  • Reoperation / statistics & numerical data
  • Sarcoma / mortality
  • Sarcoma / pathology
  • Sarcoma / surgery*
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult