Interactions with combined chemical cues inform harvester ant foragers' decisions to leave the nest in search of food
- PMID: 23308106
- PMCID: PMC3540075
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052219
Interactions with combined chemical cues inform harvester ant foragers' decisions to leave the nest in search of food
Abstract
Social insect colonies operate without central control or any global assessment of what needs to be done by workers. Colony organization arises from the responses of individuals to local cues. Red harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex barbatus) regulate foraging using interactions between returning and outgoing foragers. The rate at which foragers return with seeds, a measure of food availability, sets the rate at which outgoing foragers leave the nest on foraging trips. We used mimics to test whether outgoing foragers inside the nest respond to the odor of food, oleic acid, the odor of the forager itself, cuticular hydrocarbons, or a combination of both with increased foraging activity. We compared foraging activity, the rate at which foragers passed a line on a trail, before and after the addition of mimics. The combination of both odors, those of food and of foragers, is required to stimulate foraging. The addition of blank mimics, mimics coated with food odor alone, or mimics coated with forager odor alone did not increase foraging activity. We compared the rates at which foragers inside the nest interacted with other ants, blank mimics, and mimics coated with a combination of food and forager odor. Foragers inside the nest interacted more with mimics coated with combined forager/seed odors than with blank mimics, and these interactions had the same effect as those with other foragers. Outgoing foragers inside the nest entrance are stimulated to leave the nest in search of food by interacting with foragers returning with seeds. By using the combined odors of forager cuticular hydrocarbons and of seeds, the colony captures precise information, on the timescale of seconds, about the current availability of food.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Harvester ants use interactions to regulate forager activation and availability.Anim Behav. 2013 Jul;86(1):197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.05.012. Anim Behav. 2013. PMID: 24031094 Free PMC article.
-
Interactions Increase Forager Availability and Activity in Harvester Ants.PLoS One. 2015 Nov 5;10(11):e0141971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141971. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26539724 Free PMC article.
-
The regulation of ant colony foraging activity without spatial information.PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(8):e1002670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002670. Epub 2012 Aug 23. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012. PMID: 22927811 Free PMC article.
-
Harvester ant colony variation in foraging activity and response to humidity.PLoS One. 2013 May 23;8(5):e63363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063363. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23717415 Free PMC article.
-
Experimental ethology of learning in desert ants: Becoming expert navigators.Behav Processes. 2019 Jan;158:181-191. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 5. Behav Processes. 2019. PMID: 30529645 Review.
Cited by
-
Age and Task Modulate Olfactory Sensitivity in the Florida Carpenter Ant Camponotus floridanus.Insects. 2023 Aug 23;14(9):724. doi: 10.3390/insects14090724. Insects. 2023. PMID: 37754692 Free PMC article.
-
Harvester ant colonies differ in collective behavioural plasticity to regulate water loss.R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Sep 20;10(9):230726. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230726. eCollection 2023 Sep. R Soc Open Sci. 2023. PMID: 37736532 Free PMC article.
-
Colonies of ants allocate exploratory individuals to where they are ecologically needed.Curr Zool. 2022 Aug 23;69(5):585-591. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoac065. eCollection 2023 Oct. Curr Zool. 2022. PMID: 37637320 Free PMC article.
-
A feedback control principle common to several biological and engineered systems.J R Soc Interface. 2022 Mar;19(188):20210711. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0711. Epub 2022 Mar 2. J R Soc Interface. 2022. PMID: 35232277 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Movement, Encounter Rate, and Collective Behavior in Ant Colonies.Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2020 Nov 12;114(5):541-546. doi: 10.1093/aesa/saaa036. eCollection 2021 Sep. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2020. PMID: 34512857 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gordon DM (2007) Control without hierarchy. Nature 4468: 143. - PubMed
-
- O'Donnell S (2001) Worker biting interactions and task performance in a swarm-founding eusocial wasp (Polybia occidentalis, Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Behav Ecol 12: 353–359.
-
- Biesmeijer JC, van Nieuwstadt MGL, Lukacs S, Sommeijer MJ (1998) The role of internal and external information in foraging decisions of Melipona workers (Hymenoptera: Meliponinae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42: 107–116.
-
- Fernandez PC, Gil M, Farina WM (2003) Reward rate and forager activation in honeybees: recruiting mechanisms and temporal distribution of arrivals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54: 80–87.
-
- Camazine S (1993) The regulation of pollen foraging by honey-bees – How foragers assess the colony need for pollen? Behav Eco Sociobiol 32: 265–272.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
