Can urodynamic stress incontinence be diagnosed by ultrasound?

Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Aug;24(8):1399-403. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-2032-4. Epub 2013 Jan 12.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Multichannel urodynamic testing is commonly used to diagnose urodynamic stress incontinence (USI). It has been claimed that USI may be diagnosed by imaging. In this study we determined the predictive value of ultrasound findings for USI.

Methods: This is an observational study utilising data obtained during urodynamic testing. Data sets were analysed in 209 patients in order to determine the predictive value of sonographic findings for the diagnosis of USI.

Results: Bladder neck descent and maximal urethral pressure were the only independent predictors of USI identified by multivariate logistic regression. The finding of a cystourethrocele with funnelling increased the odds of a diagnosis of USI by 2.5 (95 % confidence interval 1.17-5.4, p = 0.018).

Conclusions: Translabial ultrasound can identify an anatomical configuration that is associated with USI. However, sonographic findings are insufficient to predict USI and can not replace urodynamic testing.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Middle Aged
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Ultrasonography
  • Urethra / diagnostic imaging
  • Urethra / physiopathology
  • Urinary Bladder / diagnostic imaging
  • Urinary Bladder / physiopathology
  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress / diagnosis*
  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress / diagnostic imaging*
  • Urinary Incontinence, Stress / physiopathology
  • Urodynamics / physiology*
  • Young Adult