Selective D-dimer testing for diagnosis of a first suspected episode of deep venous thrombosis: a randomized trial
- PMID: 23318311
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-2-201301150-00003
Selective D-dimer testing for diagnosis of a first suspected episode of deep venous thrombosis: a randomized trial
Abstract
Background: D-Dimer testing is sensitive but not specific for diagnosing deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Changing the use of testing and the threshold level for a positive test result on the basis of risk for DVT might improve the tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity and reduce the need for testing.
Objective: To determine whether using a selective D-dimer testing strategy based on clinical pretest probability (C-PTP) for DVT is safe and reduces diagnostic testing compared with using a single D-dimer threshold for all patients.
Design: Randomized, multicenter, controlled trial. Patients were allocated using a central automated system. Ultrasonographers and study adjudicators but not other study personnel were blinded to trial allocation. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00157677)
Setting: 5 Canadian hospitals.
Patients: Consecutive symptomatic patients with a first episode of suspected DVT.
Intervention: Selective testing (n = 860), defined as D-dimer testing for outpatients with low or moderate C-PTP (DVT excluded at D-dimer levels <1.0 µg/mL [low C-PTP] or <0.5 µg/mL [moderate C-PTP]) and venous ultrasonography without D-dimer testing for outpatients with high C-PTP and inpatients, or uniform testing (n = 863), defined as D-dimer testing for all participants (DVT excluded at D-dimer levels <0.5 µg/mL).
Measurements: The proportion of patients not diagnosed with DVT during initial testing who had symptomatic venous thromboembolism during 3-month follow-up and the proportion of patients undergoing D-dimer testing and ultrasonography.
Results: The incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism at 3 months was 0.5% in both study groups (difference, 0.0 percentage point [95% CI, -0.8 to 0.8 percentage points]). Selective testing reduced the proportion of patients who required D-dimer testing by 21.8 percentage points (CI, 19.1 to 24.8 percentage points). It reduced the proportion who required ultrasonography by 7.6 percentage points (CI, 2.9 to 12.2 percentage points) overall and by 21.0 percentage points (CI, 14.2 to 27.6 percentage points) in outpatients with low C-PTP.
Limitation: Results may not be generalizable to all D-dimer assays or patients with previous DVT, study personnel were not blinded, and the trial was stopped prematurely.
Conclusion: A selective D-dimer testing strategy seems as safe as and more efficient than having everyone undergo D-dimer testing when diagnosing a first episode of suspected DVT.
Primary funding source: Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario.
Comment in
-
Thrombosis: Selective D-dimer testing improves efficiency of DVT diagnosis.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013 Mar;10(3):118. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.11. Epub 2013 Feb 5. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23380976 No abstract available.
-
Clot Disruption: the role of the D-dimer in testing for deep vein thrombosis.Biomark Med. 2013 Jun;7(3):400-1. Biomark Med. 2013. PMID: 23878872 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Combined use of pretest clinical probability score and latex agglutination D-dimer testing for excluding acute deep vein thrombosis.J Vasc Surg. 2009 Nov;50(5):1099-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.06.059. Epub 2009 Aug 22. J Vasc Surg. 2009. PMID: 19703748
-
Uses of different D-dimer levels can reduce the need for venous duplex scanning to rule out deep vein thrombosis in patients with symptomatic pulmonary embolism.J Vasc Surg. 2007 Sep;46(3):526-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.05.026. J Vasc Surg. 2007. PMID: 17826240
-
An evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a randomized trial.Ann Intern Med. 2006 Jun 6;144(11):812-21. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-11-200606060-00007. Ann Intern Med. 2006. PMID: 16754923 Clinical Trial.
-
Does this patient have deep vein thrombosis?JAMA. 2006 Jan 11;295(2):199-207. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.2.199. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 16403932 Review.
-
A critical appraisal of non-invasive diagnosis and exclusion of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism: how many tests do we need?Int Angiol. 2005 Mar;24(1):27-39. Int Angiol. 2005. PMID: 15876996 Review.
Cited by
-
D-dimer Testing in Pulmonary Embolism with a Focus on Potential Pitfalls: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 12;12(11):2770. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112770. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36428830 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Incremental value of compression ultrasound sonography in the emergency department.World J Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep 9;10(5):194-203. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v10.i5.194. eCollection 2021 Sep 9. World J Crit Care Med. 2021. PMID: 34616656 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A rapid preliminary prediction model for intestinal necrosis in acute mesenteric ischemia: a retrospective study.BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr 7;21(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01746-0. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021. PMID: 33827660 Free PMC article.
-
Recent advances in understanding, diagnosing and treating venous thrombosis.F1000Res. 2020 Oct 6;9:F1000 Faculty Rev-1206. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.27115.1. eCollection 2020. F1000Res. 2020. PMID: 33082930 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Safety of a strategy combining D-dimer testing and whole-leg ultrasonography to rule out deep vein thrombosis.Blood Adv. 2020 Oct 27;4(20):5002-5010. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002173. Blood Adv. 2020. PMID: 33057634 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
