Nationwide trends in the surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis
- PMID: 23324922
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182833e7c
Nationwide trends in the surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective analysis using national administrative data.
Objective: This study presents US nationwide trends in the surgical management of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with and without coexisting spondylolisthesis and scoliosis from 2004 to 2009.
Summary of background data: Lack of consensus and wide variability exists in surgical decision making for patients with LSS.
Methods: Data were obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, a database developed as part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. All discharged patients with a primary diagnosis of LSS were identified. Three subgroups were studied: (1) LSS alone, (2) LSS with spondylolisthesis, and (3) LSS with scoliosis. Surgical treatment was divided into 3 groups: (1) decompression only (laminectomy, discectomy), (2) simple fusion (1-2 disc levels, single approach), and (3) complex fusion (>2 disc levels or a combined posterior and anterior approach).
Results: Between 2004 and 2009, national estimates for the annual number of discharged inpatients with a primary diagnosis of LSS increased from 94,011 (population rate, [the age adjusted population rate per 100,000] 32.1) to 102,107 (population rate, 33.3). The rate of decompressions decreased from 58.5% to 49.2% for discharged patients with LSS from 2004 to 2009 (P < 0.05), whereas the rate of simple fusions increased from 21.5% to 31.2% (P < 0.05) and the rate of complex fusions did not change at 6.7%. From 2004 to 2009, the use of bone morphogenetic protein more than doubled from 14.5% to 33.0% of all fusions, and the use of interbody devices increased from 28.5% to 45.1% (P < 0.05). In 2009, 26.2% of patients with LSS without instability underwent a fusion procedure, while 82.7% of patients with LSS with coexisting spondylolisthesis and 67.6% of patients with coexisting scoliosis underwent a fusion procedure.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the rate of simple fusion surgery has increased for treatment of LSS compared with decompression only.
Level of evidence: 4.
Similar articles
-
National Trends in the Surgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Dec 1;44(23):E1369-E1378. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003155. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019. PMID: 31343618
-
Reoperation and revision rates of 3 surgical treatment methods for lumbar stenosis associated with degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Dec 15;38(26):2287-94. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000068. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013. PMID: 24150428
-
Surgical treatment patterns among Medicare beneficiaries newly diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis.Spine J. 2010 Jul;10(7):588-94. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.026. Epub 2010 Apr 8. Spine J. 2010. PMID: 20381431
-
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive Decompression.Neurosurgery. 2017 Mar 1;80(3):355-367. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw091. Neurosurgery. 2017. PMID: 28362963 Review.
-
Lumbar spinal stenosis: indications for arthrodesis and spinal instrumentation.Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:313-9. Instr Course Lect. 2005. PMID: 15948459 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparing the Efficacy of Transforaminal and Caudal Epidural Injections of Calcitonin in Treating Degenerative Spinal Canal Stenosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Feb 16;14(1):e142822. doi: 10.5812/aapm-142822. eCollection 2024 Feb. Anesth Pain Med. 2024. PMID: 38725918 Free PMC article.
-
Recovery pattern after decompression of central lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational cohort study.J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Mar 25;19(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04614-1. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 38528550 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in lumbar interbody fusion: A study of American Board of Orthopedic Surgery (ABOS) candidate data.Surg Neurol Int. 2023 Dec 15;14:426. doi: 10.25259/SNI_502_2023. eCollection 2023. Surg Neurol Int. 2023. PMID: 38213447 Free PMC article.
-
Variations in surgical practice and short-term outcomes for degenerative lumbar scoliosis and spondylolisthesis: do surgeon training and experience matter?Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Feb 2;36(1):mzad109. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad109. Int J Qual Health Care. 2024. PMID: 38156345 Free PMC article.
-
Patterns in Decompression and Fusion Procedures for Patients With Lumbar Stenosis After Major Clinical Trial Results, 2016 to 2019.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2326357. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26357. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37523184 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
