Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Apr;23(2):80-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Jan 14.

DNA replication timing, genome stability and cancer: late and/or delayed DNA replication timing is associated with increased genomic instability

Affiliations
Review

DNA replication timing, genome stability and cancer: late and/or delayed DNA replication timing is associated with increased genomic instability

Nathan Donley et al. Semin Cancer Biol. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Normal cellular division requires that the genome be faithfully replicated to ensure that unaltered genomic information is passed from one generation to the next. DNA replication initiates from thousands of origins scattered throughout the genome every cell cycle; however, not all origins initiate replication at the same time. A vast amount of work over the years indicates that different origins along each eukaryotic chromosome are activated in early, middle or late S phase. This temporal control of DNA replication is referred to as the replication-timing program. The replication-timing program represents a very stable epigenetic feature of chromosomes. Recent evidence has indicated that the replication-timing program can influence the spatial distribution of mutagenic events such that certain regions of the genome experience increased spontaneous mutagenesis compared to surrounding regions. This influence has helped shape the genomes of humans and other multicellular organisms and can affect the distribution of mutations in somatic cells. It is also becoming clear that the replication-timing program is deregulated in many disease states, including cancer. Aberrant DNA replication timing is associated with changes in gene expression, changes in epigenetic modifications and an increased frequency of structural rearrangements. Furthermore, certain replication timing changes can directly lead to overt genomic instability and may explain unique mutational signatures that are present in cells that have undergone the recently described processes of "chromothripsis" and "kataegis". In this review, we will discuss how the normal replication timing program, as well as how alterations to this program, can contribute to the evolution of the genomic landscape in normal and cancerous cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Acquired alterations in DNA replication timing in cancer cells. A) Examples of individual loci that display a shift in replication timing. Loci that shift to an earlier time of replication are indicated in green, and regions that shift to a later time of replication are indicated in red. Three different chromosomes are shown. B) An example of an individual chromosome with a chromosome-wide delay in replication (red). Two chromosomes with normal replication timing are shown in grey.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Models for localized genomic instability in cancer cells. A) Aberrant late replication model for kataegis. A localized region of a chromosome has acquired abnormally late replication (red) either as a result of chromosome rearrangement or as a result of a localized shift in the replication timing program [16]. Increased mutagenesis is induced in the late replicating region due to error prone repair mechanisms functioning during late replication. B) Aberrant late replication model for Chromothripsis. Disruption of discrete cis-acting loci result in a chromosome-wide delay in replication timing. Mitotic chromosome condensation initiates on the delayed chromosome prior to completion of DNA synthesis resulting in premature chromosome condensation, stalled replication forks, and rearrangement of the affected chromosomes via non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), microhomology mediated break induced replication (MMBIR) and fork stalling and template switching (FoSTeS) mechanisms. The resulting chromosome contains numerous structural alterations (translocations, deletions, inversions, and duplications).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Masai H, Matsumoto S, You Z, Yoshizawa-Sugata N, Oda M. Eukaryotic chromosome DNA replication: where, when, and how? Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:89–130. - PubMed
    1. Dimitrova DS, Prokhorova TA, Blow JJ, Todorov IT, Gilbert DM. Mammalian nuclei become licensed for DNA replication during late telophase. J Cell Sci. 2002;115:51–59. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu JR, Gilbert DM. A distinct G1 step required to specify the Chinese hamster DHFR replication origin. Science. 1996;271:1270–1272. - PubMed
    1. Cvetic C, Walter JC. Eukaryotic origins of DNA replication: could you please be more specific? Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2005;16:343–353. - PubMed
    1. Teer JK, Dutta A. Regulation of S phase. Results Probl Cell Differ. 2006;42:31–63. - PubMed

Publication types