WHO strategy for collecting safety data in public health programmes: complementing spontaneous reporting systems

Drug Saf. 2013 Feb;36(2):75-81. doi: 10.1007/s40264-012-0014-6.


Globally, national pharmacovigilance systems rely on spontaneous reporting in which suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are reported to a national coordinating centre by health professionals, manufacturers or patients. Spontaneous reporting systems are the easiest to establish and the cheapest to run but suffer from poor-quality reports and underreporting. It is difficult to estimate rates and frequencies of ADRs through spontaneous reporting. Public health programmes need to quantify and characterize risks to individuals and communities from their medicines, to minimize harm and improve use, to sustain public confidence in the programmes, and to track problems due to medication errors and poor quality medicines. Additional methods are therefore needed to monitor the quantitative aspects of medicine safety, to better identify specific risk factors and high-risk groups, and to characterize ADRs associated with specific medicines and in specific populations. The present paper introduces two methods, cohort event monitoring and targeted spontaneous reporting, that are being implemented by the WHO, in its public health programmes, to complement spontaneous reporting. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods and how each can be applied in clinical practice are discussed.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems / standards*
  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Drug Monitoring / methods*
  • Drug Monitoring / standards
  • Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions*
  • Health Personnel
  • Humans
  • Pharmacovigilance*
  • Public Health / standards*
  • World Health Organization