Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;9(1):e1002803.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002803. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

Approximate Bayesian computation

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Approximate Bayesian computation

Mikael Sunnåker et al. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) constitutes a class of computational methods rooted in Bayesian statistics. In all model-based statistical inference, the likelihood function is of central importance, since it expresses the probability of the observed data under a particular statistical model, and thus quantifies the support data lend to particular values of parameters and to choices among different models. For simple models, an analytical formula for the likelihood function can typically be derived. However, for more complex models, an analytical formula might be elusive or the likelihood function might be computationally very costly to evaluate. ABC methods bypass the evaluation of the likelihood function. In this way, ABC methods widen the realm of models for which statistical inference can be considered. ABC methods are mathematically well-founded, but they inevitably make assumptions and approximations whose impact needs to be carefully assessed. Furthermore, the wider application domain of ABC exacerbates the challenges of parameter estimation and model selection. ABC has rapidly gained popularity over the last years and in particular for the analysis of complex problems arising in biological sciences (e.g., in population genetics, ecology, epidemiology, and systems biology).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Parameter estimation by Approximate Bayesian Computation: a conceptual overview.
Figure 2
Figure 2. A dynamic bistable hidden Markov model.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Posterior of θ obtained in the example (red), compared with the true posterior distribution (black), and ABC simulations with large n.
The use of the insufficient summary statistic ω introduces a bias, even when requiring ε = 0 (light green).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rubin DB (1984) Bayesianly justifiable and relevant frequency calculations for the applies statistician. The Annals of Statistics 12: 1151–1172.
    1. Diggle PJ, Gratton J (1984) Monte Carlo methods of inference for implicit statistical models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 46: 193–227.
    1. Bartlett MS (1963) The spectral analysis of point processes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 25: 264–296.
    1. Hoel DG, Mitchell TJ (1971) The simulation, fitting and testing of a stochastic cellular proliferation model. Biometrics 27: 191–199. - PubMed
    1. Tavare S, Balding DJ, Griffiths RC, Donnelly P (1997) Inferring coalescence times from DNA sequence data. Genetics 145: 505–518. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

MS was supported by SystemsX.ch (RTD project YeastX). AGB was supported by SystemsX.ch (RTD projects YeastX and LiverX). JC was supported by the European Research Council grant no. 239784. EN was supported by the FICS graduate school. MF was supported by a Swiss NSF grant No 3100-126074 to Laurent Excoffier. CD was supported by SNSF advanced researcher fellowship no. 136461. The funders had no role in the preparation of the manuscript.