Outcome from consecutive ICSI cycles in patients treated with recombinant human LH and those supplemented with urinary hCG-based LH activity during controlled ovarian stimulation in the long GnRH-agonist protocol
- PMID: 23350573
- DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2012.754873
Outcome from consecutive ICSI cycles in patients treated with recombinant human LH and those supplemented with urinary hCG-based LH activity during controlled ovarian stimulation in the long GnRH-agonist protocol
Abstract
Clinical results were compared in a well-established, assisted reproduction program during the cross-over from highly purified (HP)-human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) to rhFSH/rhLH. We included the last 33 patients treated with HP-hMG and the first 33 patients receiving rhFSH/rhLH for ovarian stimulation in their first intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle. Patient baseline characteristics were almost identical in the two groups. Ovarian stimulation characteristics (days of stimulation, total amount of FSH administered using a modest initial loading dose of 150 IU/d, patients with oocyte retrieval) were similar for the two groups. However, the number of total and leading follicles and E2 serum levels on the human chorionic gonadotropin injection day were significantly higher in the rhFSH/rhLH group. The oocyte yield was significantly higher in the rhFSH/rhLH group as well as the number of metaphase II oocytes, difference almost reaching the statistical significance. The number of oocytes fertilized was also higher in patients receiving rhFSH/rhLH treatment. Implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were similar in both the study groups. It is concluded that in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation under pituitary suppression for ART, the recombinant combined product containing FSH and LH in a fixed 2:1 ratio is more effective than HP-hMG in terms of follicle development, oocyte yield and quality, and fertilization rates.
Similar articles
-
Supplementation with a recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin microdose leads to similar outcomes in ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone using either a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist for pituitary suppression.Fertil Steril. 2010 Jun;94(1):167-72. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.075. Epub 2009 Apr 1. Fertil Steril. 2010. PMID: 19342035 Clinical Trial.
-
Ovarian responses to recombinant FSH or HMG in normogonadotrophic women following pituitary desensitization by a depot GnRH agonist for assisted reproduction.Reprod Biomed Online. 2003 Jul-Aug;7(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61726-9. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003. PMID: 12930572
-
The effect of exogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) on oocyte viability: evidence from a comparative study using recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) alone or in combination with recombinant LH for ovarian stimulation in pituitary-suppressed women undergoing assisted reproduction.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001 May;18(5):250-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1016662100572. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001. PMID: 11464575 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Development of Gonadotropins for Clinical Use in the Treatment of Infertility.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Jul 3;10:429. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00429. eCollection 2019. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019. PMID: 31333582 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Parkes lecture: controlled ovarian stimulation in women.J Reprod Fertil. 2000 Nov;120(2):201-10. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.1200201. J Reprod Fertil. 2000. PMID: 11058434 Review.
Cited by
-
Luteinizing hormone supplementation in women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism seeking fertility care: Insights from a narrative review.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 1;13:907249. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.907249. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35979440 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical outcomes following long GnRHa ovarian stimulation with highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin plus rFSH or rFSH in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a multi-center randomized controlled trial.Ann Transl Med. 2019 Apr;7(7):146. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.04.16. Ann Transl Med. 2019. PMID: 31157267 Free PMC article.
-
Controlled ovarian stimulation with r-FSH plus r-LH vs. HMG plus r-FSH in patients candidate for IVF/ICSI cycles: An RCT.Int J Reprod Biomed. 2017 Jul;15(7):435-440. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2017. PMID: 29177245 Free PMC article.
-
Retrospective analysis of treatments with recombinant FSH and recombinant LH versus human menopausal gonadotropin in women with reduced ovarian reserve.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 Dec;34(12):1645-1651. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1034-z. Epub 2017 Sep 4. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017. PMID: 28871409 Free PMC article.
-
Controlled Ovarian Stimulation with recombinant-FSH plus recombinant-LH vs. human Menopausal Gonadotropin based on the number of retrieved oocytes: results from a routine clinical practice in a real-life population.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015 Jul 25;13:77. doi: 10.1186/s12958-015-0080-6. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015. PMID: 26209525 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
