Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;178(1):68-75.
doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-12-00173.

Recommendations for biomonitoring of emergency responders: focus on occupational health investigations and occupational health research

Affiliations

Recommendations for biomonitoring of emergency responders: focus on occupational health investigations and occupational health research

John A Decker et al. Mil Med. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

The disaster environment frequently presents rapidly evolving and unpredictable hazardous exposures to emergency responders. Improved estimates of exposure and effect from biomonitoring can be used to assess exposure-response relationships, potential health consequences, and effectiveness of control measures. Disaster settings, however, pose significant challenges for biomonitoring. A decision process for determining when to conduct biomonitoring during and following disasters was developed. Separate but overlapping decision processes were developed for biomonitoring performed as part of occupational health investigations that directly benefit emergency responders in the short term and for biomonitoring intended to support research studies. Two categories of factors critical to the decision process for biomonitoring were identified: Is biomonitoring appropriate for the intended purpose and is biomonitoring feasible under the circumstances of the emergency response? Factors within these categories include information needs, relevance, interpretability, ethics, methodology, and logistics. Biomonitoring of emergency responders can be a valuable tool for exposure and risk assessment. Information needs, relevance, and interpretability will largely determine if biomonitoring is appropriate; logistical factors will largely determine if biomonitoring is feasible. The decision process should be formalized and may benefit from advance planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. [accessed October 22, 2012];Protection of Human Subjects, 45 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 46. Available at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html.
    1. National Research Council. Biological markers in environmental health research. Environ Health Perspect. 1987;74:3–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schulte PA, Perera, editors. Molecular Epidemiology: Principles and Practices. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1993.
    1. Ross D. The role of metabolism and specific metabolites in benzene-induced toxicity: evidence and issues. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2000;61(5–6):357–72. - PubMed
    1. Kitt MM, Decker JA, Delaney L, et al. Protecting workers in large-scale emergency responses: NIOSH experience in the Deepwater Horizon response. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(7):711–5. - PubMed