Redefining the standardized infection ratio to aid in consumer value purchasing
- PMID: 23370222
- DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182809f31
Redefining the standardized infection ratio to aid in consumer value purchasing
Abstract
The derivations of the standardized infection ratio (SIR) are reviewed in this report. To be most understandable to the consumer, the SIR National Benchmark of 1.0 should reflect what is obtainable.The SIR is a tool intended to be used by consumers in value purchasing to compare differences between facilities and thus should not adjust for these differences. Ideally, factors used in risk adjustment should solely be based upon patient characteristics. Thus, facility-specific adjustments (i.e., medical school affiliation, major teaching institution and unit bed size) should be used with caution in calculating the SIR and their use made clearly transparent to health-care consumers.Using data downloaded from the US Department of Health and Human Services' website, Hospital Compare, we observed an average SIR for central line blood stream infections of 0.568 and an SIR at the peak of the distribution curve approximating 0.35. A suggested methodology to calculate an obtainable SIR is to set the National Benchmark of 1.0 at the location of the distribution curve's peak. The curve's peak is more reflective of higher performing facilities. The SIR needs to reflect the expected performance of facilities, which are using up-to-date methods of infection control. The remainder of the facility SIRs can then be adjusted accordingly.It is recommended that the obtainable SIR be calculated every other year using data from the most recent 3 years. This enables the SIR to be reset as the control of health care-associated infections progressively improves.
Similar articles
-
SIR, you've led me astray!Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Mar;32(3):276-82. doi: 10.1086/658331. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21460513
-
Addressing misconceptions in valuing health.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Feb;13(1):1-3. doi: 10.1586/erp.12.90. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013. PMID: 23402439 No abstract available.
-
Upcoming rules and benchmarks concerning the monitoring of and the payment for surgical infections.Surg Clin North Am. 2014 Dec;94(6):1219-31. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Oct 30. Surg Clin North Am. 2014. PMID: 25440120 Review.
-
[Benchmarking is an Effective Instrument to Improve Clinical Services--Pro].Psychiatr Prax. 2016 Mar;43(2):71-2. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-111038. Epub 2016 Mar 8. Psychiatr Prax. 2016. PMID: 26953803 German. No abstract available.
-
Regional quality groups in the Society for Vascular Surgery® Vascular Quality Initiative.J Vasc Surg. 2013 Mar;57(3):884-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.10.006. Epub 2013 Jan 24. J Vasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 23352358 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing the necessity of the standardized infection ratio for reporting central line-associated bloodstream infections.PLoS One. 2013 Nov 4;8(11):e79554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079554. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24223966 Free PMC article.
-
Can inpatient hospital experiences predict central line-associated bloodstream infections?PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061097. Epub 2013 Apr 5. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23577195 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
