From heptahelical bundle to hits from the Haystack: structure-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands
- PMID: 23374191
- DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407865-9.00015-7
From heptahelical bundle to hits from the Haystack: structure-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands
Abstract
This review will focus on the construction, refinement, and validation of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) structural models for the purpose of structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) and ligand design. The review will present a comparative analysis of GPCR crystal structures and their implication on GPCR (homology) modeling. The challenges associated with steps along the modeling workflow will be discussed: the use of experimental anchors to steer the modeling procedure, amino acid sequence alignment and template selection, receptor structure refinement, loop modeling, ligand-binding mode prediction, and virtual screening for novel ligands. An overview of several successful structure-based ligand discovery and design studies shows that receptor models, despite structural inaccuracies, can be efficiently used to find novel ligands for GPCRs. Moreover, the recently solved GPCR crystal structures have further increased the opportunities in structure-based ligand discovery for this pharmaceutically important protein family.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
From three-dimensional GPCR structure to rational ligand discovery.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;796:129-57. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7423-0_7. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014. PMID: 24158804 Review.
-
Structure-based virtual screening of MT2 melatonin receptor: influence of template choice and structural refinement.J Chem Inf Model. 2013 Apr 22;53(4):821-35. doi: 10.1021/ci4000147. Epub 2013 Apr 9. J Chem Inf Model. 2013. PMID: 23541165
-
Homology modeling of G-protein-coupled receptors with X-ray structures on the rise.Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2010 May;13(3):317-25. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2010. PMID: 20443165 Review.
-
PREDICT modeling and in-silico screening for G-protein coupled receptors.Proteins. 2004 Oct 1;57(1):51-86. doi: 10.1002/prot.20195. Proteins. 2004. PMID: 15326594
-
C(X)CR in silico: Computer-aided prediction of chemokine receptor-ligand interactions.Drug Discov Today Technol. 2012 Winter;9(4):e281-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2012.05.002. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2012. PMID: 24990665
Cited by
-
The role of water and protein flexibility in the structure-based virtual screening of allosteric GPCR modulators: an mGlu5 receptor case study.J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2019 Sep;33(9):787-797. doi: 10.1007/s10822-019-00224-w. Epub 2019 Sep 21. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2019. PMID: 31542869 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of the Structural Accuracy of Homology Models on Their Applicability to Docking-Based Virtual Screening: The β2 Adrenergic Receptor as a Case Study.J Chem Inf Model. 2019 Jul 22;59(7):3177-3190. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00380. Epub 2019 Jul 1. J Chem Inf Model. 2019. PMID: 31257873 Free PMC article.
-
How Ligands Illuminate GPCR Molecular Pharmacology.Cell. 2017 Jul 27;170(3):414-427. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.009. Cell. 2017. PMID: 28753422 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Structural Analysis of Chemokine Receptor-Ligand Interactions.J Med Chem. 2017 Jun 22;60(12):4735-4779. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01309. Epub 2017 Mar 10. J Med Chem. 2017. PMID: 28165741 Free PMC article. Review.
-
High-Affinity α-Conotoxin PnIA Analogs Designed on the Basis of the Protein Surface Topography Method.Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 14;6:36848. doi: 10.1038/srep36848. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 27841338 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
