Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2013 Oct;11(10):1319-24.
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.12.044. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

A cost-efficacy decision analysis of prophylactic clip placement after endoscopic removal of large polyps

Affiliations
Comment

A cost-efficacy decision analysis of prophylactic clip placement after endoscopic removal of large polyps

Neehar D Parikh et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Background & aims: Delayed bleeding after lower endoscopy and polypectomy can cause significant morbidity. One strategy to reduce bleeding is to place an endoscopic clip on the polypectomy site. We used decision analysis to investigate the cost-effectiveness of routine clip placement after colon polypectomy.

Methods: Probabilities and plausible ranges were obtained from the literature, and a decision analysis was conducted by using TreeAge Pro 2011 Software. Our cost-effectiveness threshold was an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year. The reference case was a 50-year-old patient who had a single 1.0- to 1.5-cm polyp removed during colonoscopy. We estimated postpolypectomy bleeding rates for patients receiving no medications, those with planned resumption of antiplatelet therapy (nonaspirin), or those receiving anticoagulation therapy after polypectomy. We performed several sensitivity analyses, varying the cost of a clip and hospitalization, number of clips placed, clip effectiveness in reducing postpolypectomy bleeding, reduction in patient utility days related to gastrointestinal bleeding, and probability of harm from clip placement.

Results: On the basis of the reference case, when patients did not receive anticoagulation therapy, clip placement was not cost-effective. However, for patients who did receive anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies, prophylactic clip placement was a cost-effective strategy. The cost-effectiveness of a prophylactic clip strategy was sensitive to the costs of clips and hospitalization, number of clips placed, and clip effectiveness.

Conclusions: Placement of a prophylactic endoscopic clip after polypectomy appears to be a cost-effective strategy for patients who receive antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy. This approach should be studied in a controlled trial.

Keywords: Endoclip; ICER; QALY; Resection; incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: The authors have no disclosures or conflicts of interest

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Decision tree for prophylactic clip placement
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Sensitivity Analysis on Probability of Post-Polypectomy Bleed
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis of Reduction in Bleed Rate with Clip and Bleeding Rate
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Fig. 4a: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis of Cost of GI Bleed and Bleeding Rate; Fig. 4b: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis of Cost of Clip and Bleeding Rate; Fig. 4c: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis on Number of Clips Placed and Bleeding Rate; Fig 4d: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis of Utility Reduction for Hospitalization and Bleeding Rate; Fig. 4e: Two Way Sensitivity Analysis on Number of Clips Placed and Probability of harm from clip
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Fig. 4a: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis of Cost of GI Bleed and Bleeding Rate; Fig. 4b: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis of Cost of Clip and Bleeding Rate; Fig. 4c: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis on Number of Clips Placed and Bleeding Rate; Fig 4d: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis of Utility Reduction for Hospitalization and Bleeding Rate; Fig. 4e: Two Way Sensitivity Analysis on Number of Clips Placed and Probability of harm from clip
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Fig. 4a: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis of Cost of GI Bleed and Bleeding Rate; Fig. 4b: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis of Cost of Clip and Bleeding Rate; Fig. 4c: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis on Number of Clips Placed and Bleeding Rate; Fig 4d: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis of Utility Reduction for Hospitalization and Bleeding Rate; Fig. 4e: Two Way Sensitivity Analysis on Number of Clips Placed and Probability of harm from clip
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Fig. 4a: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis of Cost of GI Bleed and Bleeding Rate; Fig. 4b: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis of Cost of Clip and Bleeding Rate; Fig. 4c: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis on Number of Clips Placed and Bleeding Rate; Fig 4d: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis of Utility Reduction for Hospitalization and Bleeding Rate; Fig. 4e: Two Way Sensitivity Analysis on Number of Clips Placed and Probability of harm from clip
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Fig. 4a: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis of Cost of GI Bleed and Bleeding Rate; Fig. 4b: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis of Cost of Clip and Bleeding Rate; Fig. 4c: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis on Number of Clips Placed and Bleeding Rate; Fig 4d: Two-Way Sensitivity Analysis of Utility Reduction for Hospitalization and Bleeding Rate; Fig. 4e: Two Way Sensitivity Analysis on Number of Clips Placed and Probability of harm from clip

Comment in

  • Fat polyp, thin blood: think clip!
    Borodyansky L, Saltzman JR. Borodyansky L, et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Oct;11(10):1333-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.05.032. Epub 2013 Jun 10. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013. PMID: 23756223 No abstract available.

Comment on

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Winawer SJ, Krabshuis J, Lambert R, et al. Cascade colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a global conceptual model. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45(4):297–300. Epub 2011/02/09. - PubMed
    1. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2006;101(4):873–85. Epub 2006/04/26. - PubMed
    1. Munroe CA, Lee P, Copland A, et al. A tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates during endoscopic training: a venture into uncharted territory. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(3):561–7. Epub 2012/02/22. - PubMed
    1. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(8):687–96. Epub 2012/02/24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gupta S, Saunders BP, Fraser C, et al. The first 3 years of national bowel cancer screening at a single UK tertiary centre. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(2):166–73. Epub 2011/06/22. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms