Health care provider surveys in the United States, 2000-2010: a review
- PMID: 23378504
- DOI: 10.1177/0163278712474001
Health care provider surveys in the United States, 2000-2010: a review
Abstract
Surveys of health care providers (e.g., physicians and other health care professionals) are an important tool for assessing health care practices and the settings in which care is delivered. Although multiple methods are used to increase survey data quality, little is known about which methods are most commonly implemented. We reviewed 117 large surveys described in literature published between 2000 and 2010, examining descriptions of survey design features, survey implementation, and response rates. Despite wide variation, the typical provider survey selected practicing physicians as respondents, used the American Medical Association Masterfile as sample frame, included mail as both mode of initial contact and questionnaire administration mode, and offered monetary incentives to respondents. Our review revealed inconsistency of documentation concerning procedures used, and a variety of response rate calculation methods, such that it was difficult to determine practices that maximize response rate. We recommend that reports provide more comprehensive documentation concerning key methodological features to improve assessment of survey data quality.
Similar articles
-
How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physicians.Fam Pract. 2009 Feb;26(1):65-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn097. Epub 2008 Dec 12. Fam Pract. 2009. PMID: 19074758
-
Surveying clinicians by web: current issues in design and administration.Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep;36(3):352-81. doi: 10.1177/0163278713496630. Eval Health Prof. 2013. PMID: 23975760
-
Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training.Can Fam Physician. 2008 Oct;54(10):1424-30. Can Fam Physician. 2008. PMID: 18854472 Free PMC article.
-
A review of how to conduct a surgical survey using a questionnaire.Knee. 2011 Aug;18(4):209-13. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2010.10.003. Epub 2010 Nov 5. Knee. 2011. PMID: 21115354 Review.
-
Designing a sustainable national registry for stroke quality improvement.Am J Prev Med. 2006 Dec;31(6 Suppl 2):S251-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.08.013. Epub 2006 Nov 7. Am J Prev Med. 2006. PMID: 17178314 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluating strategies to recruit health researchers to participate in online survey research.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jul 18;24(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02275-6. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024. PMID: 39026149 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer Survivorship Care in the United States at Facilities Accredited by the Commission on Cancer.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2418736. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18736. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38958979 Free PMC article.
-
Team players and helpers - describing professional identity among finnish physicians in a cross-sectional study.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05268-7. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 38504233 Free PMC article.
-
Workforce readiness for pharmacogenomics and key elements for sustainment within the Veterans Health Administration.Pharmacogenomics. 2024 Feb;25(3):133-145. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2023-0193. Epub 2024 Mar 5. Pharmacogenomics. 2024. PMID: 38440834
-
Satisfaction With Abortion Training in an Abortion-Restrictive State.J Grad Med Educ. 2023 Oct;15(5):551-557. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00935.1. J Grad Med Educ. 2023. PMID: 37781426 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
