Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice
- PMID: 23381520
- DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1078
Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice
Abstract
For many patients, the time spent meeting with their physician-the clinical encounter-is the most opportune moment for them to become engaged in their own health through the process of shared decision making. In the United States shared decision making is being promoted for its potential to improve the health of populations and individual patients, while also helping control care costs. In this overview we describe the three essential elements of shared decision making: recognizing and acknowledging that a decision is required; knowing and understanding the best available evidence; and incorporating the patient's values and preferences into the decision. To achieve the promise of shared decision making, more physicians need training in the approach, and more practices need to be reorganized around the principles of patient engagement. Additional research is also needed to identify the interventions that are most effective.
Similar articles
-
Patient preferences versus physicians' judgement: does it make a difference in healthcare decision making?Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Jun;11(3):163-80. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0023-3. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013. PMID: 23529716 Review.
-
Engaging Multidisciplinary Stakeholders to Drive Shared Decision-Making in Oncology.J Palliat Care. 2019 Jan;34(1):29-31. doi: 10.1177/0825859718810723. Epub 2018 Nov 1. J Palliat Care. 2019. PMID: 30382006
-
How contextual issues can distort shared decision making.Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016 Dec;118-119:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Nov 3. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2016. PMID: 27987564
-
[Shared decision making: an approach to strengthening patient participation in rehabilitation].Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003 Jun;42(3):129-35. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40097. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003. PMID: 12813649 German.
-
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12;(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 15;(9):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub3. PMID: 20464744 Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Shared Decision-making in Palliative and End-of-life Care in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.US Cardiol. 2024 Sep 4;18:e13. doi: 10.15420/usc.2024.03. eCollection 2024. US Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 39494405 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Towards a New Integrated Model for Taking Into Account the Experiential Knowledge of People With Chronic Diseases, Integrating Mediation, Therapeutic Education and Partnership: The Expanded Chronic Care Patient-Professional Partnership Model.Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70054. doi: 10.1111/hex.70054. Health Expect. 2024. PMID: 39373129 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Physiotherapy rehabilitation experiences of people with shoulder dislocation in ARTISAN study: a qualitative study.BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 16;14(9):e083975. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-083975. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39284703 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Closing the value-based circle in shared decision-making: a digital framework for informing the shared decision-making process through patient reported outcome and experience measures.Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 29;12:1452440. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1452440. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39267640 Free PMC article.
-
Patients' Preferences for Bone-Anchored Prostheses After Lower-Extremity Amputation: A 2-Center Discrete Choice Experiment in The Netherlands (PREFER-BAP-1).J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Nov 6;106(21):2017-2027. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00204. Epub 2024 Sep 6. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024. PMID: 39241087
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
