Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug;48(4):1393-414.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12035. Epub 2013 Feb 10.

The effect of pay-for-performance in nursing homes: evidence from state Medicaid programs

Rachel M Werner  1 , R Tamara Konetzka, Daniel Polsky
Affiliations

The effect of pay-for-performance in nursing homes: evidence from state Medicaid programs

Rachel M Werner et al. Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Pay-for-performance (P4P) is commonly used to improve health care quality in the United States and is expected to be frequently implemented under the Affordable Care Act. However, evidence supporting its use is mixed with few large-scale, rigorous evaluations of P4P. This study tests the effect of P4P on quality of care in a large-scale setting-the implementation of P4P for nursing homes by state Medicaid agencies.

Data sources/study setting: 2001-2009 nursing home Minimum Data Set and Online Survey, Certification, and Reporting (OSCAR) datasets.

Study design: Between 2001 and 2009, eight state Medicaid agencies adopted P4P programs in nursing homes. We use a difference-in-differences approach to test for changes in nursing home quality under P4P, taking advantage of the variation in timing of implementation across these eight states and using nursing homes in the 42 non-P4P states plus Washington, DC as contemporaneous controls.

Principal findings: Quality improvement under P4P was inconsistent. While three clinical quality measures (the percent of residents being physically restrained, in moderate to severe pain, and developed pressure sores) improved with the implementation of P4P in states with P4P compared with states without P4P, other targeted quality measures either did not change or worsened. Of the two structural measures of quality that were tied to payment (total number of deficiencies and nurse staffing) deficiency rates worsened slightly under P4P while staffing levels did not change.

Conclusions: Medicaid-based P4P in nursing homes did not result in consistent improvements in nursing home quality. Expectations for improvement in nursing home care under P4P should be tempered.

Keywords: Quality of care; long-term care; nursing home quality; pay-for-performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Abt Associates Inc. Report to Congress: Appropriateness of Minimum Nurse Staffing Ratios in Nursing Homes Phase II Final Report. Baltimore, MD: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 2001.
    1. Abt Associates Inc. Quality Monitoring for Medicare Global Payment Demonstrations: Nursing Home Quality-Based Purchasing Demonstration. Baltimore, MD: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 2006.
    1. Berlowitz DR, Brandeis GH, Anderson JJ, Ash AS, Kader B, Morris JN, Moskowitz MA. “Evaluation of a Risk-Adjustment Model for Pressure Ulcer Development Using the Minimum Data Set”. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2001;49(7):872–6. - PubMed
    1. Castle NG, Fogel BS, Mor V. “Study Shows Higher Quality of Care in Facilities Administered by ACHCA Members”. Journal of Long Term Care Administration. 1996;24(2):11–6. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. 2005. “Medicare Begins Performance-Based Payments for Physicians Groups: New Demonstration Program Tests Financial Incentives for Improved Quality and Coordination in Large Group Practices” [accessed January 16, 2008]. Available at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/apps/media/press/release.asp?Counter=1341.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources