Income eligibility thresholds, premium contributions, and children's coverage outcomes: a study of CHIP expansions
- PMID: 23398477
- PMCID: PMC3626333
- DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12039
Income eligibility thresholds, premium contributions, and children's coverage outcomes: a study of CHIP expansions
Abstract
Objective: To understand the effects of Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) income eligibility thresholds and premium contribution requirements on health insurance coverage outcomes among children.
Data sources: 2002-2009 Annual Social and Economic Supplements of the Current Population Survey linked to data from multiple secondary data sources.
Study design: We use a selection correction model to simultaneously estimate program eligibility and coverage outcomes conditional upon eligibility. We simulate the effects of three premium schedules representing a range of generosity levels and the effects of income eligibility thresholds ranging from 200 to 400 percent of the federal poverty line.
Principal findings: Premium contribution requirements decrease enrollment in public coverage and increase enrollment in private coverage, with larger effects for greater contribution levels. Our simulation results suggest minimal changes in coverage outcomes from eligibility expansions to higher income families under premium schedules that require more than a modest contribution (medium or high schedules).
Conclusions: Our simulation results are useful counterpoints to previous research that has estimated the average effect of program expansions as they were implemented without disentangling the effects of premiums or other program features. The sensitivity to premiums observed suggests that although contribution requirements may be effective in reducing crowd-out, they also have the potential, depending on the level of contribution required, to nullify the effects of CHIP expansions entirely. The persistence of uninsurance among children under the range of simulated scenarios points to the importance of Affordable Care Act provisions designed to make the process of obtaining coverage transparent and navigable.
© Health Research and Educational Trust.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Out-of-Pocket Spending and Premium Contributions After Implementation of the Affordable Care Act.JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar 1;178(3):347-355. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8060. JAMA Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29356828 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing potential enrollment and budgetary effects of SCHIP premiums: findings from Arizona and Kentucky.Health Serv Res. 2007 Dec;42(6 Pt 2):2354-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00772.x. Health Serv Res. 2007. PMID: 17995547 Free PMC article.
-
Public and private health insurance premiums: how do they affect the health insurance status of low-income childless adults?Inquiry. 2012 Spring;49(1):52-64. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_49.01.04. Inquiry. 2012. PMID: 22650017
-
Relative Affordability of Health Insurance Premiums under CHIP Expansion Programs and the ACA.J Health Polit Policy Law. 2011 Oct;36(5):859-77. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1407658. Epub 2011 Jul 22. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2011. PMID: 21785010
-
Medicaid and CHIP Premiums and Access to Care: A Systematic Review.Pediatrics. 2016 Mar;137(3):e20152440. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2440. Epub 2016 Feb 19. Pediatrics. 2016. PMID: 26908708 Review.
Cited by
-
A Scoping Review to Identify Community- and Societal-Level Strategies Evaluated from 2013 to 2023 for Their Potential Impact on Child Well-Being in the United States.Children (Basel). 2024 Aug 31;11(9):1070. doi: 10.3390/children11091070. Children (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39334603 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Disparities in Pediatric Oncology: The 21st Century Opportunity to Improve Outcomes for Children and Adolescents With Cancer.Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2021 Jun;41:e315-e326. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_320499. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2021. PMID: 34061564 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of the Eligibility Threshold of a French Means-Tested Health Insurance Programme on Doctor Visits: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis.Health Econ. 2017 Dec;26(12):e17-e34. doi: 10.1002/hec.3464. Epub 2017 Mar 20. Health Econ. 2017. PMID: 28321959 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bansak C, Raphael S. “The Effects of State Policy Design Features on Take Up and Crowd Out Rates for the State Children's Health Insurance Program”. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2006;26(1):149–75. - PubMed
-
- Bissell MK, Allen M. 2001. “Healthy Ties: Ensuring Health Coverage for Children Raised by Grandparents and Other Relatives: Children's Defense Fund Report 2001” [accessed on November 15, 2010]. Available at http://cdf.childrensdefense.org/site/DocServer/healthyties_fullreport.pd....
-
- Cutler DM, Gruber J. “Does Public Insurance Crowd Out Private Insurance?”. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1996;111(2):391–430.
-
- Davern M, Jones A, Jr, Lepkowski J, Davidson G, Blewett LA. “Estimating Regression Standard Errors with Data from the Current Population Survey's Public Use File”. Inquiry. 2007;44(2):211–24. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
