Managing and treating headache of cervicogenic origin

Abstract

CGH is a common entity that has been assessed historically in various medical disciplines. Currently, CGH is a controversial topic whose existence has supporters and naysayers. The difficulty evaluating CGH is caused by a lack of objective findings on imaging and biologic tests. Patients present with pain but often with a lack of hard, concrete physical findings. Other clinical diagnoses may confound the clinical presentation of patients. The concomitant presence of ON and migraine headaches has been noted in the literature. Positive analgesia after interventional techniques remains the major way to consider the diagnosis in potential patients with headaches. Although the IHS has acknowledged CGH as a secondary headache in its diagnostic schema, more research, specifically randomized double-blinded evaluations of patients with CGH, are required. These data would be deemed as objective gold-standard evidence to lead us from controversy to collaborative agreement regarding the fate of CGH. What is certain regarding CGH is that a cooperative effort should be considered in the treatment of the patients between evaluating physicians, interventional pain physicians, surgeons, and physical therapy providers. This multidisciplinary effort can lead to the effective management of CGH.