Cochlear implantation in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 23429927
- DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.1744
Cochlear implantation in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Importance: Sensorineural hearing loss is the third leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. Cochlear implants may provide a viable alternative to hearing aids for this type of hearing loss. The Coverage and Analysis Group at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services was interested in an evaluation of recently published literature on this topic. In addition, this meta-analysis is to our knowledge the first to evaluate quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes in adults with cochlear implants.
Objective: To evaluate the communication-related outcomes and health-related QOL outcomes after unilateral or bilateral cochlear implantation in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
Data sources: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and previous reports from January 1, 2004, through May 31, 2012.
Study selection: Published studies of adult patients undergoing unilateral or bilateral procedures with multichannel cochlear implants and assessments using open-set sentence tests, multisyllable word tests, or QOL measures.
Data extraction: Five researchers extracted information on population characteristics, outcomes of interest, and study design and assessed the studies for risk of bias. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.
Results: A total of 42 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most unilateral implant studies showed a statistically significant improvement in mean speech scores as measured by open-set sentence or multisyllable word tests; meta-analysis revealed a significant improvement in QOL after unilateral implantation. Results from studies assessing bilateral implantation showed improvement in communication-related outcomes compared with unilateral implantation and additional improvements in sound localization compared with unilateral device use or implantation only. Based on a few studies, the QOL outcomes varied across tests after bilateral implantation.
Conclusions and relevance: Unilateral cochlear implants provide improved hearing and significantly improve QOL, and improvements in sound localization are noted for bilateral implantation. Future studies of longer duration, higher-quality reporting, and large databases or registries of patients with long-term follow-up data are needed to yield stronger evidence.
Similar articles
-
Hearing Instruments for Unilateral Severe-to-Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Ear Hear. 2016 Sep-Oct;37(5):495-507. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000313. Ear Hear. 2016. PMID: 27232073 Free PMC article. Review.
-
General Health Quality of Life Instruments Underestimate the Impact of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation.Otol Neurotol. 2019 Jul;40(6):745-753. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002225. Otol Neurotol. 2019. PMID: 31192902 Free PMC article.
-
Hybrid cochlear implantation: quality of life, quality of hearing, and working performance compared to patients with conventional unilateral or bilateral cochlear implantation.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Oct;274(10):3599-3604. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4690-9. Epub 2017 Jul 31. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017. PMID: 28762045
-
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implants for severe to profound deafness in children and adults: a systematic review and economic model.Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13(44):1-330. doi: 10.3310/hta13440. Health Technol Assess. 2009. PMID: 19799825 Review.
-
Unilateral Cochlear Implants for Severe, Profound, or Moderate Sloping to Profound Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Consensus Statements.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Oct 1;146(10):942-953. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0998. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020. PMID: 32857157
Cited by
-
Precise control of neural activity using dynamically optimized electrical stimulation.Elife. 2024 Nov 7;13:e83424. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83424. Elife. 2024. PMID: 39508555 Free PMC article.
-
Noise exposure of the inner ear during robotic drilling.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08925-1. Online ahead of print. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 39198307
-
Knowledge and Practice in Cochlear Re-Implantation in the UK: A Survey for Audiologists.Audiol Res. 2024 Jul 17;14(4):649-658. doi: 10.3390/audiolres14040055. Audiol Res. 2024. PMID: 39051199 Free PMC article.
-
A scoping review on the clinical effectiveness of Trans-Impedance Matrix (TIM) measurements in detecting extracochlear electrodes and tip fold overs in Cochlear Ltd devices.PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0299597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299597. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38452034 Free PMC article.
-
Intracochlear Trauma and Local Ossification Patterns Differ Between Straight and Precurved Cochlear Implant Electrodes.Otol Neurotol. 2024 Mar 1;45(3):245-255. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004102. Epub 2024 Jan 17. Otol Neurotol. 2024. PMID: 38270168
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
