A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method
- PMID: 23446580
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31827cf576
A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method
Abstract
Background: The aims of the current study were to (1) measure trends in the type of mastectomy performed, (2) evaluate sociodemographic/hospital characteristics of patients undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy versus unilateral mastectomies, and (3) analyze reconstruction rates and method used following different mastectomy types.
Methods: Mastectomies from 1998 to 2008 were analyzed using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Mastectomies (n = 178,603) were classified as either unilateral, contralateral prophylactic, or bilateral prophylactic. Reconstructive procedures were categorized into either implant or autologous. Longitudinal trends were analyzed with Poisson regression and sociodemographic/hospital variables were analyzed with logistic regression.
Results: Unilateral mastectomies decreased 2 percent per year, whereas contralateral and bilateral prophylactic mastectomies increased significantly by 15 and 12 percent per year, respectively (p < 0.01). Independent predictors for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (compared with unilateral mastectomy) were patients younger than 39 years, Caucasian and Hispanic race, private insurance carriers, treated in teaching hospitals, and from South and Midwest regions. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is the only group with increased reconstruction rates throughout the study period (p < 0.01). Although implant use increased for all mastectomy types, it remains greater in bilateral and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.
Conclusions: There is increasing use of bilateral mastectomies in the United States, particularly in patients with unilateral cancer. Although implant use has increased for all mastectomy types, they are used most commonly following bilateral and contralateral prophylactic mastectomies. Changing mastectomy patterns are one factor underlying the paradigm shift away from autologous tissue to implant-based reconstruction.
Comment in
-
A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Oct;132(4):674e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829fe2ac. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013. PMID: 24076723 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jan;131(1):15-23. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729cde. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013. PMID: 23271515
-
Risk-to-Benefit Relationship of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: The Argument for Bilateral Mastectomies with Immediate Reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jul;144(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005690. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019. PMID: 31246789
-
A Comparison of Complications in Therapeutic versus Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Reconstruction: A Paired Analysis.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 May 1;149(5):1037-1047. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008981. Epub 2022 Mar 2. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022. PMID: 35245238
-
Trends and concepts in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction.J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;113(8):891-4. doi: 10.1002/jso.24201. Epub 2016 Feb 14. J Surg Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26876921 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of the literature with pooled analysis.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Nov;132(5):1043-1054. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a48b8a. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013. PMID: 23924650 Review.
Cited by
-
A Multi-Center Retrospective Observational Analysis of Three-Year Experience of Our Protocol for Prevention and Monitoring of Surgical Site Infections in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 2;16(13):2439. doi: 10.3390/cancers16132439. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39001499 Free PMC article.
-
The SAEORA Flap for Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction: A Novel Flap Design without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrices.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jun 21;12(6):e5852. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005852. eCollection 2024 Jun. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024. PMID: 38911580 Free PMC article.
-
Immediate Unilateral Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction does not Impair Pulmonary Functions: A Preliminary Prospective Study.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Apr 26. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04021-1. Online ahead of print. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024. PMID: 38671243
-
Breast Reconstruction following Mastectomy for Breast Cancer or Prophylactic Mastectomy: Therapeutic Options and Results.Life (Basel). 2024 Jan 18;14(1):138. doi: 10.3390/life14010138. Life (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38255753 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association between body mass index and outcomes after autologous breast reconstruction: a nationwide inpatient database study in Japan.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Feb;204(1):69-78. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07162-0. Epub 2023 Nov 15. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024. PMID: 37966699
References
-
- Reuben BC, Manwaring J, Neumayer LA. Recent trends and predictors in immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy in the United States. Am J Surg. 2009;198:237–243.
-
- Christian CK, Niland J, Edge SB, et al.. A multi-institutional analysis of the socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction: A study of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Ann Surg. 2006;243:241–249.
-
- Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al.. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Increasing rates of implant use. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:15–23.
-
- Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, Virnig BA. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: A trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5203–5209.
-
- Tuttle TM, Jarosek S, Habermann EB, et al.. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1362–1367.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
